RISR vs. BND
RISR (FolioBeyond Alternative Income and Interest Rate Hedge ETF) and BND (Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RISR is a Nontraditional Bonds fund actively managed by FolioBeyond, while BND is a Total Bond Market fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index. RISR is actively managed, while BND is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, RISR returned 11.28%/yr vs 3.92%/yr for BND. At a correlation of -0.51, they often move in opposite directions. RISR charges 1.13%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for BND.
Performance
RISR vs. BND - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RISR achieves a 2.99% return, which is significantly higher than BND's 0.38% return.
RISR
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- 0.01%
- YTD
- 2.99%
- 6M
- 3.27%
- 1Y
- 5.10%
- 3Y*
- 11.28%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BND
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- 0.53%
- YTD
- 0.38%
- 6M
- 0.45%
- 1Y
- 4.37%
- 3Y*
- 3.92%
- 5Y*
- 0.04%
- 10Y*
- 1.55%
RISR vs. BND - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RISR FolioBeyond Alternative Income and Interest Rate Hedge ETF | 2.99% | 4.63% | 24.20% | 7.02% | 31.98% | -0.04% |
BND Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF | 0.38% | 7.08% | 1.38% | 5.65% | -13.11% | -0.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between RISR and BND is -0.39, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2021 | -0.51 |
The correlation between RISR and BND shifts across timeframes, from -0.51 (all time) to -0.39 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RISR vs. BND — Risk / Return Rank
RISR
BND
RISR vs. BND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FolioBeyond Alternative Income and Interest Rate Hedge ETF (RISR) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RISR | BND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.21 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.96 | 1.64 | +0.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.64 | 4.69 | -0.05 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RISR vs. BND - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RISR drawdown since its inception was -14.31%, smaller than the maximum BND drawdown of -18.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RISR and BND.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RISR | BND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.31% | -18.58% | +4.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.61% | -2.68% | +0.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.07% | -5.92% | -2.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -17.91% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -18.58% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.51% | -2.26% | +1.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.17% | -3.06% | +0.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.10% | 0.93% | +0.17% |
Volatility
RISR vs. BND - Volatility Comparison
FolioBeyond Alternative Income and Interest Rate Hedge ETF (RISR) has a higher volatility of 1.23% compared to Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND) at 1.08%. This indicates that RISR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RISR | BND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.23% | 1.08% | +0.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.95% | 2.77% | +1.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.40% | 3.74% | +1.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.79% | 6.03% | +5.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.79% | 5.54% | +6.25% |
RISR vs. BND - Expense Ratio Comparison
RISR has a 1.13% expense ratio, which is higher than BND's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
RISR vs. BND - Dividend Comparison
RISR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.92%, more than BND's 3.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BND Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF | 3.96% | 3.86% | 3.67% | 3.09% | 2.60% | 2.12% | 2.38% | 2.72% | 2.81% | 2.54% | 2.51% | 2.57% |
RISR FolioBeyond Alternative Income and Interest Rate Hedge ETF | 5.92% | 5.95% | 5.67% | 7.96% | 4.26% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RISR and BND have a correlation of -0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RISR has higher volatility (1.23%) compared to BND (1.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RISR dropped -14.31% vs BND's -18.58%.
On 3-year performance, RISR leads with 11.28% vs 3.92% for BND. On fees, BND is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, BND has been the lower-risk option at 1.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, RISR has performed better with a 11.28% return vs 3.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BND is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 1.13% for RISR.
RISR has the higher dividend yield at 5.92%, compared with 3.96% for BND.
RISR is categorized as Nontraditional Bonds, while BND is Total Bond Market. They also come from different issuers: FolioBeyond and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 1.13% for RISR and 0.03% for BND.
BND currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.18 vs 0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RISR and BND
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer