RISE vs. IEMG
RISE (Pictet Emerging Markets Rising Economies ETF) and IEMG (iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds. RISE is actively managed, while IEMG is passively managed. Their 0.68 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. RISE charges 0.73%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for IEMG.
Performance
RISE vs. IEMG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
RISE
- 1D
- 1.31%
- 1M
- 4.15%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
IEMG
- 1D
- 2.73%
- 1M
- 0.50%
- 6M
- 10.57%
- YTD
- 20.33%
- 1Y
- 35.95%
- 3Y*
- 20.10%
- 5Y*
- 7.69%
- 10Y*
- 8.99%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.36%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $869.90M | $963.54M | $1.10B | |
| $24.85K | $19.88K | $35.44K |
RISE vs. IEMG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
RISE Pictet Emerging Markets Rising Economies ETF | -3.47% |
IEMG iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF | 3.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between RISE and IEMG is 0.68, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2026 | 0.68 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RISE vs. IEMG — Risk / Return Rank
RISE
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IEMG
RISE vs. IEMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pictet Emerging Markets Rising Economies ETF (RISE) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RISE | IEMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.29 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.62 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 7.96 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RISE vs. IEMG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RISE drawdown since its inception was -9.58%, smaller than the maximum IEMG drawdown of -38.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RISE and IEMG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RISE | IEMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.58% | -38.71% | +29.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -13.78% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -17.21% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.61% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -38.71% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.85% | -6.70% | +2.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.63% | -12.89% | +7.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.53% | — |
Volatility
RISE vs. IEMG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RISE | IEMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 8.74% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 21.80% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.89% | 23.83% | -5.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.89% | 19.31% | -1.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.89% | 20.34% | -2.45% |
RISE vs. IEMG - Expense Ratio Comparison
RISE has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is higher than IEMG's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
RISE vs. IEMG - Dividend Comparison
RISE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.47%, less than IEMG's 2.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IEMG iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF | 2.24% | 2.75% | 3.20% | 2.89% | 2.71% | 3.06% | 1.87% | 3.15% | 2.76% | 2.35% | 2.28% | 2.53% |
RISE Pictet Emerging Markets Rising Economies ETF | 0.47% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RISE and IEMG have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IEMG is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IEMG is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.73% for RISE.
IEMG has the higher dividend yield at 2.24%, compared with 0.47% for RISE.
They also come from different issuers: Pictet and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.73% for RISE and 0.09% for IEMG.
Find the right allocation for RISE and IEMG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer