PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RISE.L vs. IWDA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RISE.L vs. IWDA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Fallen Angels High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (RISE.L) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWDA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

RISE.L is traded in GBp, while IWDA.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IWDA.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RISE.L achieves a 1.29% return, which is significantly lower than IWDA.L's 10.12% return.


RISE.L

1D
0.13%
1M
1.26%
YTD
1.29%
6M
1.50%
1Y
9.82%
3Y*
6.74%
5Y*
4.64%
10Y*

IWDA.L

1D
0.00%
1M
4.88%
YTD
10.12%
6M
10.06%
1Y
27.03%
3Y*
17.69%
5Y*
13.03%
10Y*
13.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RISE.L vs. IWDA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RISE.L
iShares Fallen Angels High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF
1.29%5.86%5.76%7.62%-3.13%4.04%14.09%13.14%2.07%3.75%
IWDA.L
iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
10.28%12.41%21.19%18.05%-8.38%23.34%12.65%22.29%-3.62%12.15%

Correlation

The correlation between RISE.L and IWDA.L is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 5, 2016

0.42

RISE.L vs. IWDA.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RISE.L
IWDA.L

Financial Services

100.0%
14.9%

Basic Materials

-

2.8%

Communication Services

-

9.3%

Consumer Cyclical

-

8.8%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.8%

Energy

-

3.9%

Healthcare

-

8.6%

Industrials

-

9.7%

Real Estate

-

1.2%

Technology

-

32.9%

Utilities

-

2.4%

Financial Services

RISE.L
100.0%
IWDA.L
14.9%

Basic Materials

RISE.L

-

IWDA.L
2.8%

Communication Services

RISE.L

-

IWDA.L
9.3%

Consumer Cyclical

RISE.L

-

IWDA.L
8.8%

Consumer Defensive

RISE.L

-

IWDA.L
4.8%

Energy

RISE.L

-

IWDA.L
3.9%

Healthcare

RISE.L

-

IWDA.L
8.6%

Industrials

RISE.L

-

IWDA.L
9.7%

Real Estate

RISE.L

-

IWDA.L
1.2%

Technology

RISE.L

-

IWDA.L
32.9%

Utilities

RISE.L

-

IWDA.L
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RISE.L vs. IWDA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RISE.L
RISE.L Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
RISE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RISE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
RISE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
RISE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
RISE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

IWDA.L
IWDA.L Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
IWDA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWDA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWDA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
IWDA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWDA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RISE.L vs. IWDA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Fallen Angels High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (RISE.L) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWDA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RISE.LIWDA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.43

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.42

4.22

-0.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.87

15.90

-5.03

RISE.L vs. IWDA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RISE.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.00, which is comparable to the IWDA.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RISE.L and IWDA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RISE.LIWDA.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.00

2.32

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

0.90

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.85

0.86

-0.01

Drawdowns

RISE.L vs. IWDA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RISE.L drawdown since its inception was -14.31%, smaller than the maximum IWDA.L drawdown of -26.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RISE.L and IWDA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RISE.LIWDA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.31%

-26.18%

+11.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.86%

-6.37%

+3.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.65%

-18.91%

+12.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.05%

-18.91%

+8.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.25%

-0.27%

+0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.24%

-3.39%

+1.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.90%

1.70%

-0.80%

Volatility

RISE.L vs. IWDA.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Fallen Angels High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (RISE.L) is 1.24%, while iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWDA.L) has a volatility of 3.47%. This indicates that RISE.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWDA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RISE.LIWDA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.24%

3.47%

-2.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.62%

8.85%

-5.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.90%

11.62%

-6.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.66%

14.49%

-7.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.83%

15.51%

-6.68%

RISE.L vs. IWDA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

RISE.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than IWDA.L's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

RISE.L vs. IWDA.L - Dividend Comparison

RISE.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.29%, while IWDA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
IWDA.L
iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RISE.L
iShares Fallen Angels High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF
8.29%6.61%6.89%6.13%5.06%4.52%4.96%5.81%6.42%5.91%2.65%

Frequently Asked Questions


RISE.L and IWDA.L have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IWDA.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IWDA.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for RISE.L.

RISE.L is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while IWDA.L is Global Equities. RISE.L tracks ICE BofA Gbl HY Constnd TR USD, while IWDA.L tracks MSCI World Index (Net). Their fees differ too: 0.50% for RISE.L and 0.20% for IWDA.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RISE.L and IWDA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer