RIRA.TO vs. DXN.TO
RIRA.TO (Russell Investments Real Assets) and DXN.TO (Dynamic Active Global Infrastructure ETF) are both Infrastructure Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, RIRA.TO returned 7.83%/yr vs 9.47%/yr for DXN.TO. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
RIRA.TO vs. DXN.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RIRA.TO achieves a 18.72% return, which is significantly higher than DXN.TO's 13.02% return.
RIRA.TO
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- 2.78%
- 6M
- 13.99%
- YTD
- 18.72%
- 1Y
- 26.17%
- 3Y*
- 11.94%
- 5Y*
- 7.83%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 6.36%
DXN.TO
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- -0.09%
- 6M
- 11.21%
- YTD
- 13.02%
- 1Y
- 18.26%
- 3Y*
- 13.26%
- 5Y*
- 9.47%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 6.58%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA$4.12K | CA$8.05K | CA$14.08K | |
| CA$30.02K | CA$31.90K | CA$47.40K |
RIRA.TO vs. DXN.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RIRA.TO Russell Investments Real Assets | 18.72% | 10.46% | 8.03% | 4.50% | -8.47% | 17.83% | -8.82% |
DXN.TO Dynamic Active Global Infrastructure ETF | 13.02% | 15.33% | 15.13% | -0.89% | -1.00% | 10.60% | -7.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between RIRA.TO and DXN.TO is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2020 | 0.30 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RIRA.TO vs. DXN.TO — Risk / Return Rank
RIRA.TO
DXN.TO
RIRA.TO vs. DXN.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Russell Investments Real Assets (RIRA.TO) and Dynamic Active Global Infrastructure ETF (DXN.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RIRA.TO | DXN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.53 | 1.30 | +0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.98 | 2.82 | +3.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.53 | 8.39 | +13.15 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RIRA.TO vs. DXN.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RIRA.TO drawdown since its inception was -25.82%, smaller than the maximum DXN.TO drawdown of -34.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RIRA.TO and DXN.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RIRA.TO | DXN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.82% | -34.85% | +9.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.40% | -6.50% | +2.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.05% | -14.40% | +2.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.56% | -18.55% | +1.99% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.87% | +1.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.12% | -5.72% | -0.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.22% | 2.18% | -0.96% |
Volatility
RIRA.TO vs. DXN.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Russell Investments Real Assets (RIRA.TO) is 2.03%, while Dynamic Active Global Infrastructure ETF (DXN.TO) has a volatility of 2.81%. This indicates that RIRA.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DXN.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RIRA.TO | DXN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.03% | 2.81% | -0.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.56% | 8.73% | -2.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.12% | 11.02% | -1.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.70% | 12.85% | -0.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.83% | 16.63% | -2.80% |
Dividends
RIRA.TO vs. DXN.TO - Dividend Comparison
RIRA.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.78%, more than DXN.TO's 2.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DXN.TO Dynamic Active Global Infrastructure ETF | 2.00% | 2.10% | 3.26% | 2.30% | 1.21% | 0.91% | 0.35% |
RIRA.TO Russell Investments Real Assets | 3.78% | 4.27% | 4.31% | 6.16% | 6.34% | 3.95% | 4.58% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RIRA.TO and DXN.TO have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
They also come from different issuers: Russell Investments Canada Limited and Dynamic.
Find the right allocation for RIRA.TO and DXN.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer