RIPIX vs. FRSGX

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

RIPIX (Royce International Premier Fund Institutional Class) and FRSGX (Franklin Small-Mid Cap Growth Fund) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, RIPIX returned -4.52%/yr vs 6.70%/yr for FRSGX. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RIPIX charges 1.04%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for FRSGX.

Performance

RIPIX vs. FRSGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Royce International Premier Fund Institutional Class (RIPIX) and Franklin Small-Mid Cap Growth Fund (FRSGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RIPIX achieves a -0.96% return, which is significantly lower than FRSGX's 5.16% return.

RIPIX

• 1D: -1.04%
• 1M: -4.39%
• YTD: -0.96%
• 6M: -1.19%
• 1Y: -4.68%
• 3Y*: 1.63%
• 5Y*: -4.52%
• 10Y*: —

FRSGX

• 1D: -1.63%
• 1M: 1.01%
• YTD: 5.16%
• 6M: 3.11%
• 1Y: 4.71%
• 3Y*: 11.21%
• 5Y*: 6.70%
• 10Y*: 14.52%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RIPIX vs. FRSGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
RIPIX Royce International Premier Fund Institutional Class	-0.96%	9.89%	-7.04%	8.14%	-26.99%	6.22%	16.11%	34.69%	-12.52%
FRSGX Franklin Small-Mid Cap Growth Fund	5.16%	2.83%	11.36%	27.20%	-33.84%	50.07%	56.09%	31.98%	-10.76%

Correlation

The correlation between RIPIX and FRSGX is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.57
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.57
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.63
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2018	0.62

The correlation between RIPIX and FRSGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

RIPIX vs. FRSGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RIPIX

RIPIX Risk / Return Rank: 2
RIPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
RIPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
RIPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2
RIPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
RIPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2

FRSGX

FRSGX Risk / Return Rank: 6
FRSGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
FRSGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
FRSGX Omega Ratio Rank: 6
FRSGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
FRSGX Martin Ratio Rank: 7

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RIPIX vs. FRSGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Royce International Premier Fund Institutional Class (RIPIX) and Franklin Small-Mid Cap Growth Fund (FRSGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RIPIX	FRSGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.27	0.39	-0.66
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.29	0.67	-0.96
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.97	1.08	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.22	0.53	-0.75
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.52	1.62	-2.14

RIPIX vs. FRSGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RIPIX Sharpe Ratio is -0.27, which is lower than the FRSGX Sharpe Ratio of 0.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RIPIX and FRSGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RIPIX vs. FRSGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RIPIX drawdown since its inception was -41.89%, smaller than the maximum FRSGX drawdown of -69.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RIPIX and FRSGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	RIPIX	FRSGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.89%	-69.07%	+27.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.38%	-12.39%	-3.99%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.28%	-25.77%	+8.49%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-41.89%	-39.25%	-2.64%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-39.25%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-27.00%	-2.20%	-24.80%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.05%	-18.67%	+0.62%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.85%	4.04%	+2.81%

Volatility

RIPIX vs. FRSGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Royce International Premier Fund Institutional Class (RIPIX) is 4.15%, while Franklin Small-Mid Cap Growth Fund (FRSGX) has a volatility of 6.14%. This indicates that RIPIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FRSGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RIPIX	FRSGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.15%	6.14%	-1.99%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.14%	13.37%	-2.23%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.32%	16.71%	-3.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.47%	28.44%	-12.97%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.15%	25.08%	-8.93%

RIPIX vs. FRSGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RIPIX has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is higher than FRSGX's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

RIPIX vs. FRSGX - Dividend Comparison

RIPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%, less than FRSGX's 7.76% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FRSGX Franklin Small-Mid Cap Growth Fund	7.76%	8.16%	0.00%	0.00%	6.80%	41.15%	8.84%	18.91%	14.01%	8.78%	6.68%	9.71%
RIPIX Royce International Premier Fund Institutional Class	1.47%	1.46%	5.66%	3.09%	3.87%	5.02%	0.36%	0.58%	0.54%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RIPIX and FRSGX in my portfolio?

RIPIX and FRSGX have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RIPIX or FRSGX?

FRSGX has higher volatility (6.14%) compared to RIPIX (4.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RIPIX dropped -41.89% vs FRSGX's -69.07%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FRSGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.39 vs -0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.