PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RIOX vs. XMAG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RIOX vs. XMAG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Daily Target 2X Long RIOT ETF (RIOX) and Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF (XMAG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RIOX achieves a 56.03% return, which is significantly higher than XMAG's 14.27% return.


RIOX

1D
-5.15%
1M
-40.16%
6M
8.91%
YTD
56.03%
1Y
-4.51%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XMAG

1D
0.16%
1M
2.24%
6M
11.98%
YTD
14.27%
1Y
21.93%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RIOX vs. XMAG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
RIOX
Defiance Daily Target 2X Long RIOT ETF
56.03%-47.32%
XMAG
Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF
14.27%15.93%

Correlation

The correlation between RIOX and XMAG is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2025

0.55

The correlation between RIOX and XMAG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RIOX vs. XMAG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RIOX
RIOX Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
RIOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RIOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
RIOX Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
RIOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
RIOX Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

XMAG
XMAG Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
XMAG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMAG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMAG Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
XMAG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMAG Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RIOX vs. XMAG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Long RIOT ETF (RIOX) and Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF (XMAG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RIOXXMAGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.86

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.31

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.09

2.94

-3.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.14

12.85

-12.98

RIOX vs. XMAG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RIOX Sharpe Ratio is -0.04, which is lower than the XMAG Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RIOX and XMAG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RIOX vs. XMAG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RIOX drawdown since its inception was -84.40%, which is greater than XMAG's maximum drawdown of -16.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RIOX and XMAG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RIOXXMAGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.40%

-16.17%

-68.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-84.40%

-7.29%

-77.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-62.53%

-1.11%

-61.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-51.64%

-2.05%

-49.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

52.20%

1.67%

+50.53%

Volatility

RIOX vs. XMAG - Volatility Comparison

Defiance Daily Target 2X Long RIOT ETF (RIOX) has a higher volatility of 44.93% compared to Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF (XMAG) at 4.22%. This indicates that RIOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XMAG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RIOXXMAGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

44.93%

4.22%

+40.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

123.96%

9.40%

+114.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

169.28%

11.81%

+157.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

168.91%

15.12%

+153.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

168.91%

15.12%

+153.79%

RIOX vs. XMAG - Expense Ratio Comparison

RIOX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than XMAG's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

RIOX vs. XMAG - Dividend Comparison

RIOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 38.94%, more than XMAG's 0.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
RIOX
Defiance Daily Target 2X Long RIOT ETF
38.94%60.76%0.00%
XMAG
Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF
0.45%0.51%0.24%

Frequently Asked Questions


RIOX and XMAG have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RIOX has higher volatility (44.93%) compared to XMAG (4.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RIOX dropped -84.40% vs XMAG's -16.17%.

On 1-year performance, XMAG leads with 21.93% vs -4.51% for RIOX. On fees, XMAG is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, XMAG has been the lower-risk option at 4.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, XMAG has performed better with a 21.93% return vs -4.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XMAG is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for RIOX.

RIOX has the higher dividend yield at 38.94%, compared with 0.45% for XMAG.

RIOX is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while XMAG is Large Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for RIOX and 0.35% for XMAG.

XMAG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs -0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RIOX and XMAG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer