PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RIO vs. STAG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

RIO vs. STAG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rio Tinto Group (RIO) and STAG Industrial, Inc. (STAG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RIO achieves a 35.32% return, which is significantly higher than STAG's 6.64% return. Over the past 10 years, RIO has outperformed STAG with an annualized return of 22.54%, while STAG has yielded a comparatively lower 10.66% annualized return.


RIO

1D
1.65%
1M
-5.97%
YTD
35.32%
6M
43.14%
1Y
89.03%
3Y*
24.54%
5Y*
11.74%
10Y*
22.54%

STAG

1D
2.05%
1M
1.07%
YTD
6.64%
6M
4.38%
1Y
9.55%
3Y*
6.09%
5Y*
4.10%
10Y*
10.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RIO vs. STAG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RIO
Rio Tinto Group
35.32%44.47%-15.36%11.06%18.48%-3.67%36.22%33.18%-2.93%44.87%
STAG
STAG Industrial, Inc.
6.64%13.30%-10.34%26.73%-29.66%59.10%4.18%33.20%-3.81%20.68%

Correlation

The correlation between RIO and STAG is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 15, 2011

0.27

Fundamentals

Market Cap

RIO:

$172.61B

STAG:

$7.42B

EPS

RIO:

$13.11

STAG:

$1.30

PE Ratio

RIO:

8.03

STAG:

29.92

PS Ratio

RIO:

1.55

STAG:

8.45

PB Ratio

RIO:

2.77

STAG:

2.07

Total Revenue (TTM)

RIO:

$111.41B

STAG:

$863.82M

Gross Profit (TTM)

RIO:

$31.10B

STAG:

$356.54M

EBITDA (TTM)

RIO:

$40.42B

STAG:

$598.36M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RIO vs. STAG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RIO
RIO Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
RIO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RIO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
RIO Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
RIO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
RIO Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

STAG
STAG Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
STAG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STAG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
STAG Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
STAG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
STAG Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RIO vs. STAG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rio Tinto Group (RIO) and STAG Industrial, Inc. (STAG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RIOSTAGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.10

+0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.89

1.02

+4.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

21.91

2.49

+19.42

RIO vs. STAG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RIO Sharpe Ratio is 3.05, which is higher than the STAG Sharpe Ratio of 0.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RIO and STAG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RIO vs. STAG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RIO drawdown since its inception was -88.97%, which is greater than STAG's maximum drawdown of -45.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RIO and STAG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RIOSTAGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.97%

-45.08%

-43.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.19%

-9.44%

-5.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.19%

-24.59%

+0.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.25%

-42.22%

+6.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.47%

-45.08%

+7.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.97%

-3.43%

-2.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.76%

-10.50%

-13.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.09%

3.85%

+0.24%

Volatility

RIO vs. STAG - Volatility Comparison

Rio Tinto Group (RIO) has a higher volatility of 11.81% compared to STAG Industrial, Inc. (STAG) at 5.63%. This indicates that RIO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than STAG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RIOSTAGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.81%

5.63%

+6.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.27%

13.90%

+10.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.32%

19.50%

+9.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.30%

23.42%

+5.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.65%

26.17%

+4.48%

Dividends

RIO vs. STAG - Dividend Comparison

RIO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.82%, more than STAG's 3.24% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RIO
Rio Tinto Group
3.82%4.66%7.40%5.40%10.48%10.23%5.13%7.68%6.32%4.47%3.93%7.58%
STAG
STAG Industrial, Inc.
3.24%4.05%4.38%3.74%4.52%3.02%4.60%4.53%5.71%5.14%5.82%7.40%

Financials

RIO vs. STAG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Rio Tinto Group and STAG Industrial, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B30.00B35.00B202120222023202420252026
30.65B
224.21M
(RIO) Total Revenue
(STAG) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

RIO vs. STAG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Rio Tinto Group and STAG Industrial, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%202120222023202420252026
26.6%
0
Portfolio components
RIO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rio Tinto Group reported a gross profit of 8.15B and revenue of 30.65B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.6%.

STAG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, STAG Industrial, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 224.21M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

RIO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rio Tinto Group reported an operating income of 8.15B and revenue of 30.65B, resulting in an operating margin of 26.6%.

STAG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, STAG Industrial, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.32M and revenue of 224.21M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.6%.

RIO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rio Tinto Group reported a net income of 5.42B and revenue of 30.65B, resulting in a net margin of 17.7%.

STAG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, STAG Industrial, Inc. reported a net income of 61.96M and revenue of 224.21M, resulting in a net margin of 27.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


RIO and STAG have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RIO has higher volatility (11.81%) compared to STAG (5.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RIO dropped -88.97% vs STAG's -45.08%.

RIO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.05 vs 0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RIO and STAG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer