PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RIO vs. CSWC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

RIO vs. CSWC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rio Tinto Group (RIO) and Capital Southwest Corporation (CSWC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with RIO having a 14.41% return and CSWC slightly higher at 14.80%. Over the past 10 years, RIO has outperformed CSWC with an annualized return of 18.86%, while CSWC has yielded a comparatively lower 17.37% annualized return.


RIO

1D
-1.20%
1M
-11.00%
6M
7.55%
YTD
14.41%
1Y
54.91%
3Y*
17.24%
5Y*
9.21%
10Y*
18.86%
ALL TIME*
11.71%

CSWC

1D
-1.81%
1M
4.68%
6M
6.50%
YTD
14.80%
1Y
14.93%
3Y*
16.95%
5Y*
10.62%
10Y*
17.37%
ALL TIME*
12.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RIO vs. CSWC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RIO
Rio Tinto Group
14.41%44.47%-15.36%11.06%18.48%-3.67%36.22%33.18%-2.93%44.87%
CSWC
Capital Southwest Corporation
14.80%14.28%2.14%56.10%-24.63%57.40%-1.56%22.80%29.52%9.99%

Correlation

The correlation between RIO and CSWC is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 1990

0.18

Fundamentals

Market Cap

RIO:

$144.65B

CSWC:

$1.48B

EPS

RIO:

$13.11

CSWC:

$1.75

PE Ratio

RIO:

6.79

CSWC:

13.66

PS Ratio

RIO:

1.31

CSWC:

6.95

PB Ratio

RIO:

2.35

CSWC:

1.47

Total Revenue (TTM)

RIO:

$111.41B

CSWC:

$222.04M

Gross Profit (TTM)

RIO:

$31.10B

CSWC:

$172.70M

EBITDA (TTM)

RIO:

$40.42B

CSWC:

$142.78M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RIO vs. CSWC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RIO
RIO Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
RIO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RIO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
RIO Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
RIO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
RIO Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

CSWC
CSWC Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
CSWC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSWC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSWC Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
CSWC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSWC Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RIO vs. CSWC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rio Tinto Group (RIO) and Capital Southwest Corporation (CSWC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RIOCSWCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.15

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.66

0.95

+1.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.59

3.04

+5.55

RIO vs. CSWC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RIO Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is higher than the CSWC Sharpe Ratio of 0.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RIO and CSWC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RIO vs. CSWC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RIO drawdown since its inception was -88.97%, which is greater than CSWC's maximum drawdown of -68.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RIO and CSWC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RIOCSWCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.97%

-68.33%

-20.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.74%

-15.75%

-4.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.19%

-27.74%

+3.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.25%

-33.66%

-1.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.47%

-61.15%

+23.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.50%

-1.81%

-18.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.74%

-18.31%

-5.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.41%

4.93%

+1.48%

Volatility

RIO vs. CSWC - Volatility Comparison

Rio Tinto Group (RIO) has a higher volatility of 8.38% compared to Capital Southwest Corporation (CSWC) at 4.76%. This indicates that RIO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSWC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RIOCSWCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.38%

4.76%

+3.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.96%

13.36%

+11.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.72%

19.01%

+10.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.33%

22.21%

+7.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.42%

27.42%

+3.00%

Dividends

RIO vs. CSWC - Dividend Comparison

RIO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.51%, less than CSWC's 10.73% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CSWC
Capital Southwest Corporation
10.73%11.56%11.59%10.21%12.46%10.13%11.49%13.07%10.77%7.01%2.35%216.86%
RIO
Rio Tinto Group
4.51%4.66%7.40%5.40%10.48%10.23%5.13%7.68%6.32%4.47%3.93%7.58%

Financials

RIO vs. CSWC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Rio Tinto Group and Capital Southwest Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B30.00B35.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
30.65B
54.00M
(RIO) Total Revenue
(CSWC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

RIO vs. CSWC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Rio Tinto Group and Capital Southwest Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
26.6%
100.0%
Portfolio components
RIO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Rio Tinto Group reported a gross profit of 8.15B and revenue of 30.65B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.6%.

CSWC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Capital Southwest Corporation reported a gross profit of 54.00M and revenue of 54.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

RIO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Rio Tinto Group reported an operating income of 8.15B and revenue of 30.65B, resulting in an operating margin of 26.6%.

CSWC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Capital Southwest Corporation reported an operating income of 44.66M and revenue of 54.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 82.7%.

RIO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Rio Tinto Group reported a net income of 5.42B and revenue of 30.65B, resulting in a net margin of 17.7%.

CSWC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Capital Southwest Corporation reported a net income of 27.48M and revenue of 54.00M, resulting in a net margin of 50.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


RIO and CSWC have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RIO has higher volatility (8.38%) compared to CSWC (4.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RIO dropped -88.97% vs CSWC's -68.33%.

RIO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RIO and CSWC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer