PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RIO.L vs. APG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

RIO.L vs. APG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Rio Tinto PLC (RIO.L) and APi Group Corporation (APG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

RIO.L is traded in GBp, while APG is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the APG values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RIO.L achieves a 33.94% return, which is significantly higher than APG's 11.23% return.


RIO.L

1D
2.90%
1M
-5.54%
YTD
33.94%
6M
43.64%
1Y
91.04%
3Y*
21.77%
5Y*
13.58%
10Y*
23.48%

APG

1D
-0.66%
1M
-1.27%
YTD
11.23%
6M
6.49%
1Y
33.83%
3Y*
32.82%
5Y*
24.51%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RIO.L vs. APG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
RIO.L
Rio Tinto PLC
33.94%34.77%-13.38%6.96%32.01%0.26%48.60%
APG
APi Group Corporation
11.23%48.18%5.78%74.75%-18.33%43.33%63.54%

Correlation

The correlation between RIO.L and APG is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2020

0.13

Fundamentals

Market Cap

RIO.L:

£128.03B

APG:

$18.42B

EPS

RIO.L:

$13.15

APG:

$0.73

PE Ratio

RIO.L:

7.96

APG:

58.09

PS Ratio

RIO.L:

1.54

APG:

2.20

PB Ratio

RIO.L:

2.76

APG:

5.28

Total Revenue (TTM)

RIO.L:

$111.44B

APG:

$8.17B

Gross Profit (TTM)

RIO.L:

$45.93B

APG:

$2.57B

EBITDA (TTM)

RIO.L:

$44.33B

APG:

$820.00M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RIO.L vs. APG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RIO.L
RIO.L Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
RIO.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RIO.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
RIO.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
RIO.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
RIO.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

APG
APG Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
APG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
APG Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
APG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
APG Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RIO.L vs. APG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rio Tinto PLC (RIO.L) and APi Group Corporation (APG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RIO.LAPGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

1.22

+0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.47

1.96

+4.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

25.01

5.70

+19.31

RIO.L vs. APG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RIO.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.55, which is higher than the APG Sharpe Ratio of 1.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RIO.L and APG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RIO.L vs. APG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RIO.L drawdown since its inception was -85.07%, which is greater than APG's maximum drawdown of -40.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RIO.L and APG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RIO.LAPGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-85.07%

-40.11%

-44.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.99%

-17.35%

+3.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.61%

-23.99%

-0.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.63%

-40.11%

+13.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.95%

-13.45%

+7.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.53%

-8.97%

-10.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.63%

5.95%

-2.32%

Volatility

RIO.L vs. APG - Volatility Comparison

Rio Tinto PLC (RIO.L) and APi Group Corporation (APG) have volatilities of 9.91% and 10.19%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RIO.LAPGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.91%

10.19%

-0.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.46%

21.70%

-0.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.58%

28.39%

-2.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.43%

31.76%

-5.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.46%

32.41%

-3.95%

Dividends

RIO.L vs. APG - Dividend Comparison

RIO.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.84%, while APG has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
APG
APi Group Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RIO.L
Rio Tinto PLC
3.84%4.75%7.16%5.53%9.90%14.14%5.43%5.76%6.07%4.66%3.42%7.42%

Financials

RIO.L vs. APG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Rio Tinto PLC and APi Group Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B50.00B202120222023202420252026
30.91B
1.98B
(RIO.L) Total Revenue
(APG) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

RIO.L vs. APG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Rio Tinto PLC and APi Group Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%202120222023202420252026
26.6%
31.3%
Portfolio components
RIO.L - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rio Tinto PLC reported a gross profit of 8.22B and revenue of 30.91B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.6%.

APG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, APi Group Corporation reported a gross profit of 620.00M and revenue of 1.98B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 31.3%.

RIO.L - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rio Tinto PLC reported an operating income of 8.22B and revenue of 30.91B, resulting in an operating margin of 26.6%.

APG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, APi Group Corporation reported an operating income of 103.00M and revenue of 1.98B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.2%.

RIO.L - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rio Tinto PLC reported a net income of 5.46B and revenue of 30.91B, resulting in a net margin of 17.7%.

APG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, APi Group Corporation reported a net income of 51.00M and revenue of 1.98B, resulting in a net margin of 2.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


RIO.L and APG have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RIO.L and APG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer