RINYX vs. RALVX

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

RINYX (Russell Investments International Developed Markets Fund) and RALVX (Russell Investments LifePoints Growth Strategy Fund) are both mutual funds - RINYX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund managed by Russell, while RALVX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by Russell. Over the past 10 years, RINYX returned 9.02%/yr vs 8.55%/yr for RALVX. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RINYX charges 0.77%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for RALVX.

Performance

RINYX vs. RALVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Russell Investments International Developed Markets Fund (RINYX) and Russell Investments LifePoints Growth Strategy Fund (RALVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RINYX achieves a 5.80% return, which is significantly lower than RALVX's 7.82% return. Over the past 10 years, RINYX has outperformed RALVX with an annualized return of 9.02%, while RALVX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.55% annualized return.

RINYX

• 1D: -0.40%
• 1M: -1.19%
• YTD: 5.80%
• 6M: 5.48%
• 1Y: 17.30%
• 3Y*: 14.38%
• 5Y*: 7.03%
• 10Y*: 9.02%

RALVX

• 1D: 0.14%
• 1M: -0.92%
• YTD: 7.82%
• 6M: 7.00%
• 1Y: 19.24%
• 3Y*: 15.08%
• 5Y*: 7.56%
• 10Y*: 8.55%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RINYX vs. RALVX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RINYX Russell Investments International Developed Markets Fund	5.80%	28.76%	2.93%	16.47%	-13.16%	12.88%	5.91%	20.11%	-15.25%	25.22%
RALVX Russell Investments LifePoints Growth Strategy Fund	7.82%	17.44%	11.36%	17.18%	-16.76%	17.82%	6.13%	15.33%	-7.92%	13.55%

Correlation

The correlation between RINYX and RALVX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.84
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.86
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2001	0.84

The correlation between RINYX and RALVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

RINYX vs. RALVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RINYX

RINYX Risk / Return Rank: 27
RINYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
RINYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
RINYX Omega Ratio Rank: 27
RINYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
RINYX Martin Ratio Rank: 30

RALVX

RALVX Risk / Return Rank: 58
RALVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
RALVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
RALVX Omega Ratio Rank: 59
RALVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
RALVX Martin Ratio Rank: 62

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RINYX vs. RALVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Russell Investments International Developed Markets Fund (RINYX) and Russell Investments LifePoints Growth Strategy Fund (RALVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RINYX	RALVX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.22	1.84	-0.62
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.78	2.56	-0.79
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.34	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.54	2.33	-0.80
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.74	10.21	-4.47

RINYX vs. RALVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RINYX Sharpe Ratio is 1.22, which is lower than the RALVX Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RINYX and RALVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RINYX vs. RALVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RINYX drawdown since its inception was -61.67%, roughly equal to the maximum RALVX drawdown of -59.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RINYX and RALVX.

Drawdown Indicators

	RINYX	RALVX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-61.67%	-59.59%	-2.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.97%	-8.16%	-2.81%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.49%	-13.71%	+0.22%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.04%	-24.35%	-4.69%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.46%	-30.08%	-9.38%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.25%	-1.75%	-0.50%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.79%	-13.23%	-1.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.94%	1.86%	+1.08%

Volatility

RINYX vs. RALVX - Volatility Comparison

Russell Investments International Developed Markets Fund (RINYX) has a higher volatility of 4.78% compared to Russell Investments LifePoints Growth Strategy Fund (RALVX) at 4.15%. This indicates that RINYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RALVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RINYX	RALVX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.78%	4.15%	+0.63%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.59%	8.58%	+3.01%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.92%	10.42%	+3.50%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.43%	13.27%	+2.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.03%	13.66%	+2.37%

RINYX vs. RALVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RINYX has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is higher than RALVX's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

RINYX vs. RALVX - Dividend Comparison

RINYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.95%, less than RALVX's 10.82% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RALVX Russell Investments LifePoints Growth Strategy Fund	10.82%	11.68%	2.31%	1.21%	4.20%	17.98%	0.54%	6.24%	7.01%	5.99%	4.79%	1.23%
RINYX Russell Investments International Developed Markets Fund	6.95%	7.35%	3.64%	2.35%	1.45%	3.58%	1.26%	3.15%	8.95%	2.07%	2.55%	1.55%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RINYX and RALVX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.90, RINYX and RALVX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, RINYX or RALVX?

RINYX has higher volatility (4.78%) compared to RALVX (4.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RINYX dropped -61.67% vs RALVX's -59.59%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RALVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.