PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RINYX vs. PZRIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RINYX vs. PZRIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Russell Investments International Developed Markets Fund (RINYX) and PIMCO RAE Global ex-US Fund (PZRIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RINYX achieves a 11.41% return, which is significantly lower than PZRIX's 15.43% return. Over the past 10 years, RINYX has underperformed PZRIX with an annualized return of 8.86%, while PZRIX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.99% annualized return.


RINYX

1D
0.59%
1M
3.04%
6M
7.32%
YTD
11.41%
1Y
22.45%
3Y*
15.64%
5Y*
8.27%
10Y*
8.86%
ALL TIME*
5.28%

PZRIX

1D
-0.08%
1M
4.75%
6M
5.68%
YTD
15.43%
1Y
30.32%
3Y*
19.23%
5Y*
11.15%
10Y*
9.99%
ALL TIME*
10.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

RINYX vs. PZRIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RINYX
Russell Investments International Developed Markets Fund
11.41%28.76%2.93%16.47%-13.16%12.88%5.91%20.11%-15.25%25.22%
PZRIX
PIMCO RAE Global ex-US Fund
15.43%34.05%3.29%19.31%-9.11%12.08%1.74%15.94%-14.93%26.00%

Correlation

The correlation between RINYX and PZRIX is 0.81, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

0.92

The correlation between RINYX and PZRIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.81 (1 year) to 0.92 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RINYX vs. PZRIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RINYX
RINYX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
RINYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RINYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
RINYX Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
RINYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
RINYX Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

PZRIX
PZRIX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
PZRIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PZRIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
PZRIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
PZRIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
PZRIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RINYX vs. PZRIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Russell Investments International Developed Markets Fund (RINYX) and PIMCO RAE Global ex-US Fund (PZRIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RINYXPZRIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.94

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.48

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.19

3.89

-1.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.34

11.80

-3.45

RINYX vs. PZRIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RINYX Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is lower than the PZRIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RINYX and PZRIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RINYX vs. PZRIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RINYX drawdown since its inception was -61.67%, which is greater than PZRIX's maximum drawdown of -43.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RINYX and PZRIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RINYXPZRIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.67%

-43.53%

-18.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.97%

-8.18%

-2.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.49%

-13.81%

+0.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.04%

-30.85%

+1.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.46%

-43.53%

+4.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.69%

+0.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.73%

-8.80%

-5.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.88%

2.69%

+0.19%

Volatility

RINYX vs. PZRIX - Volatility Comparison

Russell Investments International Developed Markets Fund (RINYX) has a higher volatility of 3.74% compared to PIMCO RAE Global ex-US Fund (PZRIX) at 2.73%. This indicates that RINYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PZRIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RINYXPZRIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.74%

2.73%

+1.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.88%

9.57%

+2.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.92%

11.93%

+1.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.42%

15.72%

-0.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.98%

16.64%

-0.66%

RINYX vs. PZRIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RINYX has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is higher than PZRIX's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

RINYX vs. PZRIX - Dividend Comparison

RINYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.60%, more than PZRIX's 5.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PZRIX
PIMCO RAE Global ex-US Fund
5.68%6.56%6.70%9.19%8.80%11.99%2.04%6.32%2.80%4.13%2.58%0.00%
RINYX
Russell Investments International Developed Markets Fund
6.60%7.35%3.64%2.35%1.45%3.58%1.26%3.15%8.95%2.07%2.55%1.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


RINYX and PZRIX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RINYX has higher volatility (3.74%) compared to PZRIX (2.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RINYX dropped -61.67% vs PZRIX's -43.53%.

PZRIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.67 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RINYX and PZRIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer