RINF vs. STIP
RINF (ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF) and STIP (iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF) are both Inflation-Protected Bonds funds - RINF tracks the FTSE 30-Year TIPS (Treasury Rate-Hedged) Index while STIP tracks the Bloomberg US Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities (TIPS) 0-5 Years Index (Series-L). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RINF returned 4.81%/yr vs 3.14%/yr for STIP. Their 0.15 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. RINF charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for STIP.
Performance
RINF vs. STIP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RINF achieves a 3.18% return, which is significantly higher than STIP's 1.81% return. Over the past 10 years, RINF has outperformed STIP with an annualized return of 4.81%, while STIP has yielded a comparatively lower 3.14% annualized return.
RINF
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- 1.46%
- 6M
- 2.89%
- YTD
- 3.18%
- 1Y
- 4.68%
- 3Y*
- 3.98%
- 5Y*
- 5.76%
- 10Y*
- 4.81%
- ALL TIME*
- 1.02%
STIP
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 0.13%
- 6M
- 1.26%
- YTD
- 1.81%
- 1Y
- 3.05%
- 3Y*
- 5.11%
- 5Y*
- 3.06%
- 10Y*
- 3.14%
- ALL TIME*
- 2.37%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $118.15K | $123.66K | $133.91K | |
| $80.85M | $78.77M | $101.18M |
RINF vs. STIP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RINF ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF | 3.18% | 1.64% | 9.79% | 0.21% | 8.77% | 16.20% | 1.98% | 1.82% | -0.79% | -1.70% |
STIP iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF | 1.81% | 6.03% | 4.77% | 4.63% | -3.02% | 5.68% | 5.18% | 4.89% | 0.54% | 0.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between RINF and STIP is 0.01, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.10 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.09 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2012 | 0.15 |
The correlation between RINF and STIP shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (3 years) to 0.16 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RINF vs. STIP — Risk / Return Rank
RINF
STIP
RINF vs. STIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF (RINF) and iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF (STIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RINF | STIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.47 | -0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.64 | 4.78 | -3.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.07 | 15.31 | -11.24 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RINF vs. STIP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RINF drawdown since its inception was -43.51%, which is greater than STIP's maximum drawdown of -5.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RINF and STIP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RINF | STIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.51% | -5.50% | -38.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.29% | -0.73% | -1.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.62% | -0.95% | -8.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.58% | -5.50% | -8.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.18% | -5.50% | -23.68% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.25% | +0.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.28% | -0.99% | -15.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.93% | 0.23% | +0.70% |
Volatility
RINF vs. STIP - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF (RINF) has a higher volatility of 1.48% compared to iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF (STIP) at 0.38%. This indicates that RINF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than STIP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RINF | STIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.48% | 0.38% | +1.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.13% | 1.17% | +1.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.33% | 1.52% | +2.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.51% | 2.74% | +9.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.54% | 2.45% | +10.09% |
RINF vs. STIP - Expense Ratio Comparison
RINF has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than STIP's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
RINF vs. STIP - Dividend Comparison
RINF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.63%, less than STIP's 4.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RINF ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF | 3.63% | 3.89% | 4.68% | 5.07% | 1.15% | 2.76% | 0.82% | 1.90% | 2.47% | 2.99% | 1.09% | 1.83% |
STIP iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF | 4.60% | 4.11% | 2.62% | 2.84% | 6.04% | 4.15% | 1.40% | 2.06% | 2.44% | 1.59% | 0.89% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RINF and STIP have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RINF has higher volatility (1.48%) compared to STIP (0.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RINF dropped -43.51% vs STIP's -5.50%.
On 10-year performance, RINF leads with 4.81% vs 3.14% for STIP. On fees, STIP is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, STIP has been the lower-risk option at 0.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, RINF has performed better with a 4.81% return vs 3.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
STIP is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for RINF.
STIP has the higher dividend yield at 4.60%, compared with 3.63% for RINF.
RINF tracks FTSE 30-Year TIPS (Treasury Rate-Hedged) Index, while STIP tracks Bloomberg US Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities (TIPS) 0-5 Years Index (Series-L). They also come from different issuers: ProShares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for RINF and 0.06% for STIP.
STIP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RINF and STIP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer