RINC vs. SRET

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about AXS Real Estate Income ETF (RINC) and Global X SuperDividend REIT ETF (SRET).

RINC and SRET are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RINC is a passively managed fund by AXS that tracks the performance of the Gapstow Real Estate Income Index. It was launched on Aug 28, 2023. SRET is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Solactive Global SuperDividend REIT Index. It was launched on Mar 17, 2015. Both RINC and SRET are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

RINC vs. SRET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AXS Real Estate Income ETF (RINC) and Global X SuperDividend REIT ETF (SRET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

RINC vs. SRET - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
RINC AXS Real Estate Income ETF	0.00%	7.75%	-5.74%	1.71%
SRET Global X SuperDividend REIT ETF	-1.33%	18.09%	-1.55%	6.93%

Returns By Period

RINC

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SRET

• 1D: 1.82%
• 1M: -6.86%
• YTD: -1.33%
• 6M: 1.97%
• 1Y: 8.44%
• 3Y*: 7.46%
• 5Y*: 1.30%
• 10Y*: 1.15%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RINC vs. SRET - Expense Ratio Comparison

RINC has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than SRET's 0.58% expense ratio.

RINC

AXS Real Estate Income ETF

SRET

Global X SuperDividend REIT ETF

Return for Risk

RINC vs. SRET — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SRET

SRET Risk / Return Rank: 34
SRET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
SRET Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
SRET Omega Ratio Rank: 31
SRET Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
SRET Martin Ratio Rank: 39

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RINC vs. SRET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AXS Real Estate Income ETF (RINC) and Global X SuperDividend REIT ETF (SRET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RINC	SRET	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.60	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.08	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.05	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.04	—

Correlation

The correlation between RINC and SRET is 0.70, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

RINC vs. SRET - Dividend Comparison

RINC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.60%, less than SRET's 8.24% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RINC AXS Real Estate Income ETF	3.60%	6.04%	10.85%	3.88%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SRET Global X SuperDividend REIT ETF	8.24%	7.98%	8.72%	7.21%	8.30%	6.33%	8.88%	7.83%	8.54%	8.20%	8.08%	7.74%

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	RINC	SRET	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-66.98%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-11.38%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-30.56%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-66.98%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-27.93%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-22.47%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.72%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	RINC	SRET	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	5.49%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	8.35%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	14.10%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	16.54%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	24.60%	—