RINC vs. CSHP

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

RINC (AXS Real Estate Income ETF) and CSHP (iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RINC is a REIT fund tracking the Gapstow Real Estate Income Index, while CSHP is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by iShares. RINC is passively managed, while CSHP is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions. RINC charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for CSHP.

Performance

RINC vs. CSHP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AXS Real Estate Income ETF (RINC) and iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

RINC

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CSHP

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.27%
• YTD: 1.63%
• 6M: 1.93%
• 1Y: 3.96%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RINC vs. CSHP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
RINC AXS Real Estate Income ETF	0.00%	7.75%	-6.84%
CSHP iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF	1.63%	4.10%	2.24%

Correlation

The correlation between RINC and CSHP is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.11
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 2024	-0.03

RINC vs. CSHP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	RINC	CSHP
Real Estate	100.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	0.1%
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

RINC vs. CSHP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSHP

CSHP Risk / Return Rank: 100
CSHP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
CSHP Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
CSHP Omega Ratio Rank: 100
CSHP Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
CSHP Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RINC vs. CSHP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AXS Real Estate Income ETF (RINC) and iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RINC	CSHP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	11.91	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	10.75	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	RINC	CSHP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-0.08%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-0.06%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	0.00%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-0.00%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.01%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	RINC	CSHP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.07%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	0.24%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.33%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	0.40%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	0.40%	—

RINC vs. CSHP - Expense Ratio Comparison

RINC has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than CSHP's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

RINC vs. CSHP - Dividend Comparison

RINC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.16%, less than CSHP's 3.92% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
CSHP iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF	3.92%	5.39%	1.96%	0.00%
RINC AXS Real Estate Income ETF	2.16%	6.04%	10.85%	3.88%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RINC and CSHP in my portfolio?

RINC and CSHP have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, RINC or CSHP?

On fees, CSHP is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, RINC or CSHP?

CSHP is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for RINC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RINC or CSHP?

CSHP has the higher dividend yield at 3.92%, compared with 2.16% for RINC.

What is the main difference between RINC and CSHP?

RINC is categorized as REIT, while CSHP is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: AXS and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for RINC and 0.20% for CSHP.