RIGL vs. CMCL
RIGL (Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Inc.) and CMCL (Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc) are both stocks. RIGL operates in Biotechnology (Healthcare), while CMCL operates in Gold (Basic Materials). Over the past 5 years, RIGL returned -3.96%/yr vs 12.13%/yr for CMCL. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
RIGL vs. CMCL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RIGL achieves a -23.30% return, which is significantly lower than CMCL's -21.95% return.
RIGL
- 1D
- 2.40%
- 1M
- 2.24%
- YTD
- -23.30%
- 6M
- -19.45%
- 1Y
- 54.23%
- 3Y*
- 27.10%
- 5Y*
- -3.96%
- 10Y*
- 3.28%
CMCL
- 1D
- 3.65%
- 1M
- -17.97%
- YTD
- -21.95%
- 6M
- -20.06%
- 1Y
- 3.33%
- 3Y*
- 20.06%
- 5Y*
- 12.13%
- 10Y*
- —
RIGL vs. CMCL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RIGL Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | -23.30% | 154.64% | 16.00% | -3.33% | -43.40% | -24.29% | 63.55% | -6.96% | -40.72% | 38.08% |
CMCL Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc | -21.95% | 186.75% | -18.90% | 2.65% | 11.39% | -23.84% | 93.29% | 67.37% | -26.33% | 20.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between RIGL and CMCL is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2017 | 0.11 |
The correlation between RIGL and CMCL shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (all time) to 0.23 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
RIGL:
$646.69M
CMCL:
$399.89M
RIGL:
$19.21
CMCL:
$3.15
RIGL:
1.71
CMCL:
6.41
RIGL:
0.00
CMCL:
0.17
RIGL:
2.08
CMCL:
1.45
RIGL:
1.62
CMCL:
1.47
RIGL:
$299.77M
CMCL:
$274.16M
RIGL:
$279.95M
CMCL:
$142.30M
RIGL:
$125.80M
CMCL:
$137.13M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RIGL vs. CMCL — Risk / Return Rank
RIGL
CMCL
RIGL vs. CMCL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (RIGL) and Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc (CMCL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RIGL | CMCL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.06 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.09 | 0.07 | +1.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.91 | 0.13 | +1.77 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RIGL vs. CMCL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RIGL drawdown since its inception was -99.37%, which is greater than CMCL's maximum drawdown of -65.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RIGL and CMCL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RIGL | CMCL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.37% | -65.77% | -33.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -50.08% | -49.43% | -0.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -57.75% | -49.43% | -8.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -85.24% | -50.00% | -35.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -86.40% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -96.93% | -45.57% | -51.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -90.91% | -35.78% | -55.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 28.64% | 25.12% | +3.52% |
Volatility
RIGL vs. CMCL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (RIGL) is 12.05%, while Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc (CMCL) has a volatility of 14.52%. This indicates that RIGL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CMCL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RIGL | CMCL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.05% | 14.52% | -2.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.64% | 47.45% | -10.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 69.89% | 65.21% | +4.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 85.46% | 52.74% | +32.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 82.81% | 54.57% | +28.24% |
Dividends
RIGL vs. CMCL - Dividend Comparison
RIGL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CMCL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.78%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMCL Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc | 2.78% | 2.14% | 5.95% | 4.59% | 4.52% | 4.29% | 2.11% | 3.27% | 5.23% | 1.86% |
RIGL Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
RIGL vs. CMCL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
RIGL vs. CMCL - Profitability Comparison
RIGL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Inc. reported a gross profit of 54.21M and revenue of 58.82M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 92.2%.
CMCL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc reported a gross profit of 32.10M and revenue of 66.43M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 48.3%.
RIGL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Inc. reported an operating income of 11.89M and revenue of 58.82M, resulting in an operating margin of 20.2%.
CMCL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc reported an operating income of 26.87M and revenue of 66.43M, resulting in an operating margin of 40.4%.
RIGL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Inc. reported a net income of 8.65M and revenue of 58.82M, resulting in a net margin of 14.7%.
CMCL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc reported a net income of 15.85M and revenue of 66.43M, resulting in a net margin of 23.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
RIGL and CMCL have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CMCL has higher volatility (14.52%) compared to RIGL (12.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RIGL dropped -99.37% vs CMCL's -65.77%.
RIGL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.78 vs 0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RIGL and CMCL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer