RIFR vs. CSHP

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

RIFR (Russell Investments Global Infrastructure ETF) and CSHP (iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RIFR is a Industrials Equities fund actively managed by Russell, while CSHP is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by iShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, RIFR returned 12.80% vs 3.96% for CSHP. At a correlation of -0.07, they often move in opposite directions. RIFR charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for CSHP.

Performance

RIFR vs. CSHP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Russell Investments Global Infrastructure ETF (RIFR) and iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RIFR achieves a 8.62% return, which is significantly higher than CSHP's 1.63% return.

RIFR

• 1D: -0.38%
• 1M: -1.89%
• YTD: 8.62%
• 6M: 8.08%
• 1Y: 12.80%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CSHP

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.27%
• YTD: 1.63%
• 6M: 1.93%
• 1Y: 3.96%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RIFR vs. CSHP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
RIFR Russell Investments Global Infrastructure ETF	8.62%	7.21%
CSHP iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF	1.63%	2.53%

Correlation

The correlation between RIFR and CSHP is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.08
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 2025	-0.07

Return for Risk

RIFR vs. CSHP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RIFR

RIFR Risk / Return Rank: 36
RIFR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
RIFR Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
RIFR Omega Ratio Rank: 33
RIFR Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
RIFR Martin Ratio Rank: 39

CSHP

CSHP Risk / Return Rank: 100
CSHP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
CSHP Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
CSHP Omega Ratio Rank: 100
CSHP Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
CSHP Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RIFR vs. CSHP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Russell Investments Global Infrastructure ETF (RIFR) and iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RIFR	CSHP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.22	11.91	-10.68
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.73	31.26	-29.53
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	7.44	-6.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.89	65.71	-63.82
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.07	432.16	-426.09
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RIFR vs. CSHP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RIFR Sharpe Ratio is 1.22, which is lower than the CSHP Sharpe Ratio of 11.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RIFR and CSHP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RIFR	CSHP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.22	11.91	-10.68
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.47	10.75	-9.29

Drawdowns

RIFR vs. CSHP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RIFR drawdown since its inception was -6.80%, which is greater than CSHP's maximum drawdown of -0.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RIFR and CSHP.

Drawdown Indicators

	RIFR	CSHP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.80%	-0.08%	-6.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.80%	-0.06%	-6.74%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.18%	0.00%	-4.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.61%	-0.00%	-1.61%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.12%	0.01%	+2.11%

Volatility

RIFR vs. CSHP - Volatility Comparison

Russell Investments Global Infrastructure ETF (RIFR) has a higher volatility of 3.50% compared to iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP) at 0.07%. This indicates that RIFR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSHP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RIFR	CSHP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.50%	0.07%	+3.43%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.52%	0.24%	+8.28%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.51%	0.33%	+10.18%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.69%	0.40%	+10.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.69%	0.40%	+10.29%

RIFR vs. CSHP - Expense Ratio Comparison

RIFR has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than CSHP's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

RIFR vs. CSHP - Dividend Comparison

RIFR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, less than CSHP's 3.92% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
CSHP iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF	3.92%	5.39%	1.96%
RIFR Russell Investments Global Infrastructure ETF	0.90%	0.98%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RIFR and CSHP in my portfolio?

RIFR and CSHP have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RIFR or CSHP?

RIFR has higher volatility (3.50%) compared to CSHP (0.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RIFR dropped -6.80% vs CSHP's -0.08%.

Which ETF is better, RIFR or CSHP?

On 1-year performance, RIFR leads with 12.80% vs 3.96% for CSHP. On fees, CSHP is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, CSHP has been the lower-risk option at 0.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RIFR or CSHP?

Over the 1-year period, RIFR has performed better with a 12.80% return vs 3.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RIFR or CSHP?

CSHP is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for RIFR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RIFR or CSHP?

CSHP has the higher dividend yield at 3.92%, compared with 0.90% for RIFR.

What is the main difference between RIFR and CSHP?

RIFR is categorized as Industrials Equities, while CSHP is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Russell and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for RIFR and 0.20% for CSHP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CSHP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (11.91 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.