PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RIEU.L vs. DRGG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RIEU.L vs. DRGG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in L&G MSCI Europe Select UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (RIEU.L) and L&G China CNY Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (DRGG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

RIEU.L is traded in EUR, while DRGG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the DRGG.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RIEU.L achieves a 8.81% return, which is significantly higher than DRGG.L's 5.79% return.


RIEU.L

1D
-0.25%
1M
0.72%
6M
5.48%
YTD
8.81%
1Y
15.95%
3Y*
12.63%
5Y*
8.39%
10Y*

DRGG.L

1D
0.07%
1M
0.34%
6M
5.03%
YTD
5.79%
1Y
7.67%
3Y*
4.09%
5Y*
2.80%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RIEU.L vs. DRGG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
RIEU.L
L&G MSCI Europe Select UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)
8.81%15.57%9.47%15.33%-12.34%24.84%2.22%
DRGG.L
L&G China CNY Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
5.79%-6.86%9.85%-2.99%0.48%15.58%-25.28%

Correlation

The correlation between RIEU.L and DRGG.L is -0.17, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2020

-0.14

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RIEU.L vs. DRGG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RIEU.L
RIEU.L Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
RIEU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RIEU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
RIEU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
RIEU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
RIEU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

DRGG.L
DRGG.L Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
DRGG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRGG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRGG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
DRGG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRGG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RIEU.L vs. DRGG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G MSCI Europe Select UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (RIEU.L) and L&G China CNY Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (DRGG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RIEU.LDRGG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.25

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.56

2.61

-1.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.44

7.42

-1.98

RIEU.L vs. DRGG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RIEU.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.27, which is comparable to the DRGG.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RIEU.L and DRGG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RIEU.L vs. DRGG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RIEU.L drawdown since its inception was -34.22%, which is greater than DRGG.L's maximum drawdown of -25.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RIEU.L and DRGG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RIEU.LDRGG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.22%

-25.95%

-8.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.20%

-2.93%

-7.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.18%

-10.96%

-5.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.82%

-13.83%

-8.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.90%

-8.91%

+7.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.55%

-14.26%

+8.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.93%

1.03%

+1.90%

Volatility

RIEU.L vs. DRGG.L - Volatility Comparison

L&G MSCI Europe Select UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (RIEU.L) has a higher volatility of 2.93% compared to L&G China CNY Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (DRGG.L) at 1.09%. This indicates that RIEU.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DRGG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RIEU.LDRGG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.93%

1.09%

+1.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.39%

4.33%

+6.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.55%

5.69%

+6.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.60%

6.98%

+7.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.59%

12.63%

+3.96%

RIEU.L vs. DRGG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

RIEU.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than DRGG.L's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

RIEU.L vs. DRGG.L - Dividend Comparison

RIEU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DRGG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
DRGG.L
L&G China CNY Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
0.01%2.04%2.27%2.48%2.61%1.40%
RIEU.L
L&G MSCI Europe Select UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RIEU.L and DRGG.L have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, RIEU.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

RIEU.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for DRGG.L.

RIEU.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while DRGG.L is Government Bonds. RIEU.L tracks MSCI Global Select 500 Index – Europe Subset, while DRGG.L tracks J.P. Morgan China Custom Liquid ESG Capped Index. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for RIEU.L and 0.30% for DRGG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RIEU.L and DRGG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer