PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RIEU.L vs. BIOT.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RIEU.L vs. BIOT.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in L&G MSCI Europe Select UCITS ETF - EUR Accumulating ETF (RIEU.L) and L&G Pharma Breakthrough UCITS ETF - USD Accumulating ETF (BIOT.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

RIEU.L is traded in EUR, while BIOT.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BIOT.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RIEU.L achieves a 8.55% return, which is significantly lower than BIOT.L's 10.52% return.


RIEU.L

1D
-0.50%
1M
1.30%
6M
5.51%
YTD
8.55%
1Y
16.21%
3Y*
12.73%
5Y*
8.33%
10Y*

BIOT.L

1D
0.00%
1M
8.56%
6M
8.84%
YTD
10.52%
1Y
34.89%
3Y*
9.33%
5Y*
3.36%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RIEU.L vs. BIOT.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
RIEU.L
L&G MSCI Europe Select UCITS ETF - EUR Accumulating ETF
8.55%15.57%9.47%15.33%-12.34%24.84%0.23%10.89%
BIOT.L
L&G Pharma Breakthrough UCITS ETF - USD Accumulating ETF
10.52%20.28%0.94%-12.00%-2.74%3.61%17.72%9.01%

Correlation

The correlation between RIEU.L and BIOT.L is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 30, 2019

0.52

The correlation between RIEU.L and BIOT.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.44 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RIEU.L vs. BIOT.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RIEU.L
RIEU.L Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
RIEU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RIEU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
RIEU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
RIEU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
RIEU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

BIOT.L
BIOT.L Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
BIOT.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIOT.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIOT.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
BIOT.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIOT.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RIEU.L vs. BIOT.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G MSCI Europe Select UCITS ETF - EUR Accumulating ETF (RIEU.L) and L&G Pharma Breakthrough UCITS ETF - USD Accumulating ETF (BIOT.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RIEU.LBIOT.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.29

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.62

3.75

-2.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.67

11.01

-5.34

RIEU.L vs. BIOT.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RIEU.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is comparable to the BIOT.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RIEU.L and BIOT.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RIEU.L vs. BIOT.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RIEU.L drawdown since its inception was -34.22%, which is greater than BIOT.L's maximum drawdown of -30.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RIEU.L and BIOT.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RIEU.LBIOT.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.22%

-30.08%

-4.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.20%

-9.37%

-0.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.18%

-22.16%

+5.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.82%

-30.08%

+7.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.14%

-6.35%

+4.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.56%

-9.93%

+4.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.92%

3.20%

-0.28%

Volatility

RIEU.L vs. BIOT.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for L&G MSCI Europe Select UCITS ETF - EUR Accumulating ETF (RIEU.L) is 2.98%, while L&G Pharma Breakthrough UCITS ETF - USD Accumulating ETF (BIOT.L) has a volatility of 6.18%. This indicates that RIEU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BIOT.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RIEU.LBIOT.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.98%

6.18%

-3.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.41%

14.92%

-4.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.57%

20.28%

-7.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.61%

18.14%

-3.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.60%

19.32%

-2.72%

RIEU.L vs. BIOT.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

RIEU.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than BIOT.L's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

RIEU.L vs. BIOT.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither RIEU.L nor BIOT.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


RIEU.L and BIOT.L have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, RIEU.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

RIEU.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for BIOT.L.

RIEU.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while BIOT.L is Health & Biotech Equities. RIEU.L tracks L&G MSCI Europe Select UCITS ETF - EUR Accumulating ETF, while BIOT.L tracks Solactive Pharma Breakthrough Value Index Net Total Return. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for RIEU.L and 0.49% for BIOT.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RIEU.L and BIOT.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer