PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RICK vs. BUD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

RICK vs. BUD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RCI Hospitality Holdings, Inc. (RICK) and Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV (BUD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RICK achieves a 15.11% return, which is significantly lower than BUD's 31.39% return. Over the past 10 years, RICK has outperformed BUD with an annualized return of 11.05%, while BUD has yielded a comparatively lower -1.70% annualized return.


RICK

1D
1.60%
1M
13.59%
YTD
15.11%
6M
1.90%
1Y
-30.50%
3Y*
-28.96%
5Y*
-16.63%
10Y*
11.05%

BUD

1D
0.78%
1M
2.46%
YTD
31.39%
6M
32.01%
1Y
18.48%
3Y*
16.08%
5Y*
2.63%
10Y*
-1.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RICK vs. BUD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RICK
RCI Hospitality Holdings, Inc.
15.11%-58.19%-12.81%-28.66%20.04%97.94%93.85%-7.54%-19.86%64.51%
BUD
Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV
31.39%30.33%-21.37%9.04%0.09%-12.66%-13.97%27.69%-38.79%9.62%

Correlation

The correlation between RICK and BUD is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2009

0.23

The correlation between RICK and BUD shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (3 years) to 0.25 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

RICK:

$211.65M

BUD:

$163.97B

EPS

RICK:

-$0.77

BUD:

$6.15

PS Ratio

RICK:

0.82

BUD:

1.37

PB Ratio

RICK:

0.92

BUD:

1.88

Total Revenue (TTM)

RICK:

$281.63M

BUD:

$120.38B

Gross Profit (TTM)

RICK:

$176.59M

BUD:

$67.02B

EBITDA (TTM)

RICK:

$30.38M

BUD:

$35.48B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RICK vs. BUD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RICK
RICK Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
RICK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RICK Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
RICK Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
RICK Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
RICK Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

BUD
BUD Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
BUD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUD Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUD Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
BUD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUD Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RICK vs. BUD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RCI Hospitality Holdings, Inc. (RICK) and Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV (BUD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RICKBUDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.90

1.16

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.70

0.88

-1.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.00

1.66

-2.66

RICK vs. BUD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RICK Sharpe Ratio is -0.69, which is lower than the BUD Sharpe Ratio of 0.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RICK and BUD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RICK vs. BUD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RICK drawdown since its inception was -94.54%, which is greater than BUD's maximum drawdown of -70.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RICK and BUD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RICKBUDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.54%

-70.02%

-24.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-48.83%

-20.12%

-28.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-72.58%

-31.55%

-41.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-78.09%

-42.34%

-35.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-78.72%

-70.02%

-8.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-71.23%

-22.81%

-48.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-53.94%

-23.45%

-30.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

35.20%

10.86%

+24.34%

Volatility

RICK vs. BUD - Volatility Comparison

RCI Hospitality Holdings, Inc. (RICK) has a higher volatility of 10.13% compared to Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV (BUD) at 6.20%. This indicates that RICK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BUD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RICKBUDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.13%

6.20%

+3.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.93%

17.97%

+12.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

49.45%

26.38%

+23.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

43.10%

24.90%

+18.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

52.00%

27.65%

+24.35%

Dividends

RICK vs. BUD - Dividend Comparison

RICK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%, less than BUD's 1.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BUD
Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV
1.62%1.91%1.74%1.28%0.88%0.98%0.79%2.45%5.15%3.63%5.41%3.21%
RICK
RCI Hospitality Holdings, Inc.
1.06%1.17%0.45%0.36%0.21%0.21%0.38%0.63%0.54%0.43%0.70%0.00%

Financials

RICK vs. BUD - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between RCI Hospitality Holdings, Inc. and Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B30.00B35.00B20222023202420252026
68.72M
30.61B
(RICK) Total Revenue
(BUD) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

RICK vs. BUD - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between RCI Hospitality Holdings, Inc. and Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%20222023202420252026
87.2%
55.9%
Portfolio components
RICK - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, RCI Hospitality Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 59.92M and revenue of 68.72M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 87.2%.

BUD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV reported a gross profit of 17.10B and revenue of 30.61B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.9%.

RICK - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, RCI Hospitality Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 3.81M and revenue of 68.72M, resulting in an operating margin of 5.6%.

BUD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV reported an operating income of 80.56M and revenue of 30.61B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.3%.

RICK - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, RCI Hospitality Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of -326.00K and revenue of 68.72M, resulting in a net margin of -0.5%.

BUD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV reported a net income of 3.01B and revenue of 30.61B, resulting in a net margin of 9.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


RICK and BUD have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RICK has higher volatility (10.13%) compared to BUD (6.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RICK dropped -94.54% vs BUD's -70.02%.

BUD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.67 vs -0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RICK and BUD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer