RGYY vs. DBO
RGYY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST RGTI ETF) and DBO (Invesco DB Oil Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - RGYY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while DBO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the DBIQ Optimum Yield Crude Oil Index Excess Return. RGYY is actively managed, while DBO is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.10, they often move in opposite directions. RGYY charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for DBO.
Performance
RGYY vs. DBO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RGYY achieves a -27.61% return, which is significantly lower than DBO's 76.15% return.
RGYY
- 1D
- -2.20%
- 1M
- -6.03%
- YTD
- -27.61%
- 6M
- -35.32%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DBO
- 1D
- -2.05%
- 1M
- 1.22%
- YTD
- 76.15%
- 6M
- 69.63%
- 1Y
- 72.26%
- 3Y*
- 20.11%
- 5Y*
- 14.88%
- 10Y*
- 10.48%
RGYY vs. DBO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
RGYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST RGTI ETF | -27.61% | -12.10% |
DBO Invesco DB Oil Fund | 76.15% | -0.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between RGYY and DBO is -0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 26, 2025 | -0.10 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RGYY vs. DBO — Risk / Return Rank
RGYY
DBO
RGYY vs. DBO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST RGTI ETF (RGYY) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RGYY | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.10 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.46 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.33 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -1.80 | 0.01 | -1.81 |
Drawdowns
RGYY vs. DBO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RGYY drawdown since its inception was -37.05%, smaller than the maximum DBO drawdown of -90.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGYY and DBO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RGYY | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.05% | -90.18% | +53.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -18.19% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -28.20% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -37.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -61.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -36.37% | -53.65% | +17.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.23% | -62.25% | +39.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 8.96% | — |
Volatility
RGYY vs. DBO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RGYY | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 11.00% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 28.43% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.42% | 34.63% | -2.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.42% | 32.31% | +0.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.42% | 31.79% | +0.63% |
RGYY vs. DBO - Expense Ratio Comparison
RGYY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than DBO's 0.78% expense ratio.
Dividends
RGYY vs. DBO - Dividend Comparison
RGYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 115.50%, more than DBO's 1.99% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBO Invesco DB Oil Fund | 1.99% | 3.51% | 4.68% | 4.59% | 0.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.63% | 1.58% |
RGYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST RGTI ETF | 115.50% | 15.50% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RGYY and DBO have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DBO is cheaper at 0.78% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DBO is cheaper with a 0.78% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for RGYY.
RGYY has the higher dividend yield at 115.50%, compared with 1.99% for DBO.
RGYY is categorized as Derivative Income, while DBO is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for RGYY and 0.78% for DBO.
Find the right allocation for RGYY and DBO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer