RGYY vs. BDRY
RGYY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST RGTI ETF) and BDRY (Breakwave Dry Bulk Shipping ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RGYY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while BDRY is a Commodities fund tracking the Breakwave Dry Freight Futures Index. RGYY is actively managed, while BDRY is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. RGYY charges 1.07%/yr vs 3.76%/yr for BDRY.
Performance
RGYY vs. BDRY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RGYY achieves a -28.19% return, which is significantly lower than BDRY's 39.91% return.
RGYY
- 1D
- -1.05%
- 1M
- -5.21%
- 6M
- -28.19%
- YTD
- -28.19%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BDRY
- 1D
- 1.81%
- 1M
- -5.18%
- 6M
- 39.91%
- YTD
- 39.91%
- 1Y
- 112.65%
- 3Y*
- 33.39%
- 5Y*
- -14.51%
- 10Y*
- —
RGYY vs. BDRY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
RGYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST RGTI ETF | -28.19% | -11.14% |
BDRY Breakwave Dry Bulk Shipping ETF | 39.91% | -4.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between RGYY and BDRY is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2025 | -0.01 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RGYY vs. BDRY — Risk / Return Rank
RGYY
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BDRY
RGYY vs. BDRY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST RGTI ETF (RGYY) and Breakwave Dry Bulk Shipping ETF (BDRY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RGYY | BDRY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.38 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 5.25 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 14.30 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RGYY vs. BDRY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RGYY drawdown since its inception was -37.05%, smaller than the maximum BDRY drawdown of -89.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGYY and BDRY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RGYY | BDRY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.05% | -89.16% | +52.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -21.60% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -69.71% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -89.16% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -36.89% | -70.44% | +33.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.56% | -58.47% | +33.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 7.91% | — |
Volatility
RGYY vs. BDRY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RGYY | BDRY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 8.35% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 29.45% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.14% | 42.24% | -11.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.14% | 60.14% | -29.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.14% | 62.32% | -31.18% |
RGYY vs. BDRY - Expense Ratio Comparison
RGYY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is lower than BDRY's 3.76% expense ratio.
Dividends
RGYY vs. BDRY - Dividend Comparison
RGYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 133.91%, while BDRY has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BDRY Breakwave Dry Bulk Shipping ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RGYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST RGTI ETF | 133.91% | 15.50% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RGYY and BDRY have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, RGYY is cheaper at 1.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
RGYY is cheaper with a 1.07% expense ratio, compared with 3.76% for BDRY.
RGYY has the higher dividend yield at 133.91%, compared with 0.00% for BDRY.
RGYY is categorized as Derivative Income, while BDRY is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and ETFMG. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for RGYY and 3.76% for BDRY.
Find the right allocation for RGYY and BDRY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer