PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RGTZ vs. ZIVB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RGTZ vs. ZIVB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Daily Target 2X Short RGTI ETF (RGTZ) and -1x Short VIX Mid-Term Futures Strategy ETF (ZIVB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


RGTZ

1D
1.25%
1M
16.13%
YTD
-85.18%
6M
-81.74%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ZIVB

1D
0.00%
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RGTZ vs. ZIVB - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between RGTZ and ZIVB is -0.19, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026

-0.19

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RGTZ vs. ZIVB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Short RGTI ETF (RGTZ) and -1x Short VIX Mid-Term Futures Strategy ETF (ZIVB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

RGTZ vs. ZIVB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RGTZ vs. ZIVB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RGTZ drawdown since its inception was -92.92%, which is greater than ZIVB's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGTZ and ZIVB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RGTZZIVBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.92%

0.00%

-92.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-91.04%

0.00%

-91.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-44.54%

0.00%

-44.54%

Volatility

RGTZ vs. ZIVB - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RGTZZIVBDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

218.33%

112.57%

+105.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

218.33%

112.57%

+105.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

218.33%

112.57%

+105.76%

RGTZ vs. ZIVB - Expense Ratio Comparison

RGTZ has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is lower than ZIVB's 1.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

RGTZ vs. ZIVB - Dividend Comparison

RGTZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ZIVB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.37%.


Frequently Asked Questions


RGTZ and ZIVB have a correlation of -0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, RGTZ is cheaper at 1.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

RGTZ is cheaper with a 1.29% expense ratio, compared with 1.35% for ZIVB.

ZIVB has the higher dividend yield at 2.37%, compared with 0.00% for RGTZ.

They also come from different issuers: Defiance ETFs and Volatility Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.29% for RGTZ and 1.35% for ZIVB.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RGTZ and ZIVB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer