RGTZ vs. ZIVB

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

RGTZ (Defiance Daily Target 2X Short RGTI ETF) and ZIVB (-1x Short VIX Mid-Term Futures Strategy ETF) are both Inverse Equities funds. Both are actively managed. RGTZ charges 1.29%/yr vs 1.35%/yr for ZIVB.

Performance

RGTZ vs. ZIVB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Daily Target 2X Short RGTI ETF (RGTZ) and -1x Short VIX Mid-Term Futures Strategy ETF (ZIVB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

RGTZ

• 1D: 20.31%
• 1M: -76.68%
• YTD: -85.91%
• 6M: -85.92%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ZIVB

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RGTZ vs. ZIVB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
RGTZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Short RGTI ETF	18.46%
ZIVB -1x Short VIX Mid-Term Futures Strategy ETF	0.00%

Return for Risk

RGTZ vs. ZIVB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Short RGTI ETF (RGTZ) and -1x Short VIX Mid-Term Futures Strategy ETF (ZIVB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RGTZ	ZIVB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.43	—	—

Drawdowns

RGTZ vs. ZIVB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RGTZ drawdown since its inception was -92.92%, which is greater than ZIVB's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGTZ and ZIVB.

Drawdown Indicators

	RGTZ	ZIVB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-92.92%	0.00%	-92.92%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-91.48%	0.00%	-91.48%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-40.13%	0.00%	-40.13%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	RGTZ	ZIVB	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	218.54%	0.00%	+218.54%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	218.54%	0.00%	+218.54%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	218.54%	0.00%	+218.54%

RGTZ vs. ZIVB - Expense Ratio Comparison

RGTZ has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is lower than ZIVB's 1.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

RGTZ vs. ZIVB - Dividend Comparison

Neither RGTZ nor ZIVB has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, RGTZ or ZIVB?

On fees, RGTZ is cheaper at 1.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, RGTZ or ZIVB?

RGTZ is cheaper with a 1.29% expense ratio, compared with 1.35% for ZIVB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RGTZ or ZIVB?

RGTZ and ZIVB have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between RGTZ and ZIVB?

They also come from different issuers: Defiance ETFs and Volatility Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.29% for RGTZ and 1.35% for ZIVB.