RGTZ vs. YXI
RGTZ (Defiance Daily Target 2X Short RGTI ETF) and YXI (ProShares Short FTSE China 50) are both Inverse Equities funds. RGTZ is actively managed, while YXI is passively managed. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RGTZ charges 1.29%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for YXI.
Performance
RGTZ vs. YXI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RGTZ achieves a -85.18% return, which is significantly lower than YXI's 16.30% return.
RGTZ
- 1D
- 1.25%
- 1M
- 16.13%
- YTD
- -85.18%
- 6M
- -81.74%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
YXI
- 1D
- 1.77%
- 1M
- 7.38%
- YTD
- 16.30%
- 6M
- 16.98%
- 1Y
- 9.55%
- 3Y*
- -10.15%
- 5Y*
- -1.37%
- 10Y*
- -7.78%
RGTZ vs. YXI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
RGTZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Short RGTI ETF | -85.18% | 7.21% |
YXI ProShares Short FTSE China 50 | 16.30% | 6.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between RGTZ and YXI is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2025 | 0.24 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RGTZ vs. YXI — Risk / Return Rank
RGTZ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
YXI
RGTZ vs. YXI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Short RGTI ETF (RGTZ) and ProShares Short FTSE China 50 (YXI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RGTZ | YXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.10 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.77 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 1.49 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RGTZ vs. YXI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RGTZ drawdown since its inception was -92.92%, which is greater than YXI's maximum drawdown of -81.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGTZ and YXI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RGTZ | YXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.92% | -81.15% | -11.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -12.48% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -53.12% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -57.65% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -64.92% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -91.04% | -76.25% | -14.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -44.54% | -54.37% | +9.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 6.88% | — |
Volatility
RGTZ vs. YXI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RGTZ | YXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.62% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 15.49% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 218.33% | 20.12% | +198.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 218.33% | 31.48% | +186.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 218.33% | 27.43% | +190.90% |
RGTZ vs. YXI - Expense Ratio Comparison
RGTZ has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than YXI's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
RGTZ vs. YXI - Dividend Comparison
RGTZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while YXI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.64%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RGTZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Short RGTI ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
YXI ProShares Short FTSE China 50 | 2.64% | 3.60% | 4.35% | 2.66% | 0.27% | 0.00% | 0.08% | 1.01% | 0.25% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RGTZ and YXI have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, YXI is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
YXI is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for RGTZ.
YXI has the higher dividend yield at 2.64%, compared with 0.00% for RGTZ.
They also come from different issuers: Defiance ETFs and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.29% for RGTZ and 0.95% for YXI.
Find the right allocation for RGTZ and YXI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer