RGTZ vs. YXI
RGTZ (Defiance Daily Target 2X Short RGTI ETF) and YXI (ProShares Short FTSE China 50) are both exchange-traded funds - RGTZ is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by Defiance ETFs, while YXI is a China Equities fund tracking the FTSE China 50 Net Tax USD (TR) (-100%). RGTZ is actively managed, while YXI is passively managed. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RGTZ charges 1.29%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for YXI.
Performance
RGTZ vs. YXI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RGTZ achieves a -71.32% return, which is significantly lower than YXI's 10.86% return.
RGTZ
- 1D
- 15.05%
- 1M
- 78.63%
- 6M
- -61.22%
- YTD
- -71.32%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
YXI
- 1D
- -1.28%
- 1M
- 0.04%
- 6M
- 15.92%
- YTD
- 10.86%
- 1Y
- 8.52%
- 3Y*
- -9.98%
- 5Y*
- -2.98%
- 10Y*
- -7.35%
RGTZ vs. YXI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
RGTZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Short RGTI ETF | -71.32% | 7.21% |
YXI ProShares Short FTSE China 50 | 10.86% | 6.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between RGTZ and YXI is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2025 | 0.25 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RGTZ vs. YXI — Risk / Return Rank
RGTZ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
YXI
RGTZ vs. YXI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Short RGTI ETF (RGTZ) and ProShares Short FTSE China 50 (YXI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RGTZ | YXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.09 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.75 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 1.50 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RGTZ vs. YXI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RGTZ drawdown since its inception was -92.92%, which is greater than YXI's maximum drawdown of -81.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGTZ and YXI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RGTZ | YXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.92% | -81.15% | -11.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -11.39% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -53.12% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -57.65% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -61.79% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -82.67% | -77.36% | -5.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -48.11% | -54.45% | +6.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.69% | — |
Volatility
RGTZ vs. YXI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RGTZ | YXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.55% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 15.50% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 213.69% | 20.63% | +193.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 213.69% | 31.48% | +182.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 213.69% | 27.43% | +186.26% |
RGTZ vs. YXI - Expense Ratio Comparison
RGTZ has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than YXI's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
RGTZ vs. YXI - Dividend Comparison
RGTZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while YXI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.57%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RGTZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Short RGTI ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
YXI ProShares Short FTSE China 50 | 2.57% | 3.60% | 4.35% | 2.66% | 0.27% | 0.00% | 0.08% | 1.01% | 0.25% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RGTZ and YXI have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, YXI is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
YXI is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for RGTZ.
YXI has the higher dividend yield at 2.57%, compared with 0.00% for RGTZ.
RGTZ is categorized as Inverse Equities, while YXI is China Equities. They also come from different issuers: Defiance ETFs and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.29% for RGTZ and 0.95% for YXI.
Find the right allocation for RGTZ and YXI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer