RGTX vs. XMAG
RGTX (Defiance Daily Target 2X Long RGTI ETF) and XMAG (Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RGTX is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Defiance, while XMAG is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the BITA US 500 ex Magnificent 7 Index. RGTX is actively managed, while XMAG is passively managed. Over the past year, RGTX returned -6.41% vs 24.62% for XMAG. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RGTX charges 1.29%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XMAG.
Performance
RGTX vs. XMAG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RGTX achieves a -33.35% return, which is significantly lower than XMAG's 12.73% return.
RGTX
- 1D
- -20.63%
- 1M
- 51.50%
- YTD
- -33.35%
- 6M
- -56.81%
- 1Y
- -6.41%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XMAG
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 6.69%
- YTD
- 12.73%
- 6M
- 13.28%
- 1Y
- 24.62%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RGTX vs. XMAG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
RGTX Defiance Daily Target 2X Long RGTI ETF | -33.35% | 153.12% |
XMAG Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF | 12.73% | 15.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between RGTX and XMAG is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2025 | 0.41 |
RGTX vs. XMAG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RGTX
XMAG
Technology
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
RGTX
XMAG
Basic Materials
RGTX
-
XMAG
Communication Services
RGTX
-
XMAG
Consumer Cyclical
RGTX
-
XMAG
Consumer Defensive
RGTX
-
XMAG
Energy
RGTX
-
XMAG
Financial Services
RGTX
-
XMAG
Healthcare
RGTX
-
XMAG
Industrials
RGTX
-
XMAG
Real Estate
RGTX
-
XMAG
Utilities
RGTX
-
XMAG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RGTX vs. XMAG — Risk / Return Rank
RGTX
XMAG
RGTX vs. XMAG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Long RGTI ETF (RGTX) and Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF (XMAG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RGTX | XMAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.39 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.07 | 3.39 | -3.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.09 | 15.15 | -15.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RGTX | XMAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.03 | 2.23 | -2.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | 1.11 | -0.86 |
Drawdowns
RGTX vs. XMAG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RGTX drawdown since its inception was -97.33%, which is greater than XMAG's maximum drawdown of -16.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGTX and XMAG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RGTX | XMAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.33% | -16.17% | -81.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -97.33% | -7.29% | -90.04% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -93.10% | 0.00% | -93.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -55.03% | -2.13% | -52.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 70.91% | 1.63% | +69.28% |
Volatility
RGTX vs. XMAG - Volatility Comparison
Defiance Daily Target 2X Long RGTI ETF (RGTX) has a higher volatility of 83.08% compared to Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF (XMAG) at 2.87%. This indicates that RGTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XMAG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RGTX | XMAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 83.08% | 2.87% | +80.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 139.30% | 8.65% | +130.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 215.89% | 11.10% | +204.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 223.72% | 15.12% | +208.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 223.72% | 15.12% | +208.60% |
RGTX vs. XMAG - Expense Ratio Comparison
RGTX has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than XMAG's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
RGTX vs. XMAG - Dividend Comparison
RGTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, more than XMAG's 0.46% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
RGTX Defiance Daily Target 2X Long RGTI ETF | 0.82% | 0.55% | 0.00% |
XMAG Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF | 0.46% | 0.51% | 0.24% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RGTX and XMAG have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RGTX has higher volatility (83.08%) compared to XMAG (2.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RGTX dropped -97.33% vs XMAG's -16.17%.
On 1-year performance, XMAG leads with 24.62% vs -6.41% for RGTX. On fees, XMAG is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, XMAG has been the lower-risk option at 2.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, XMAG has performed better with a 24.62% return vs -6.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XMAG is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for RGTX.
RGTX has the higher dividend yield at 0.82%, compared with 0.46% for XMAG.
RGTX is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while XMAG is Large Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.29% for RGTX and 0.35% for XMAG.
XMAG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs -0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RGTX and XMAG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer