RGTX vs. IWMY
RGTX (Defiance Daily Target 2X Long RGTI ETF) and IWMY (Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RGTX is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Defiance, while IWMY is a Options Trading fund tracking the Russell 2000 Index. RGTX is actively managed, while IWMY is passively managed. Over the past year, RGTX returned -6.41% vs 23.33% for IWMY. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RGTX charges 1.29%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for IWMY.
Performance
RGTX vs. IWMY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RGTX achieves a -33.35% return, which is significantly lower than IWMY's 12.25% return.
RGTX
- 1D
- -20.63%
- 1M
- 51.50%
- YTD
- -33.35%
- 6M
- -56.81%
- 1Y
- -6.41%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IWMY
- 1D
- -1.36%
- 1M
- 3.06%
- YTD
- 12.25%
- 6M
- 10.99%
- 1Y
- 23.33%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RGTX vs. IWMY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
RGTX Defiance Daily Target 2X Long RGTI ETF | -33.35% | 153.12% |
IWMY Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF | 12.25% | 13.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between RGTX and IWMY is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2025 | 0.50 |
The correlation between RGTX and IWMY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RGTX vs. IWMY — Risk / Return Rank
RGTX
IWMY
RGTX vs. IWMY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Long RGTI ETF (RGTX) and Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF (IWMY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RGTX | IWMY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.26 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.07 | 2.03 | -2.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.09 | 6.66 | -6.75 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RGTX | IWMY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.03 | 1.49 | -1.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | 0.95 | -0.70 |
Drawdowns
RGTX vs. IWMY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RGTX drawdown since its inception was -97.33%, which is greater than IWMY's maximum drawdown of -18.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGTX and IWMY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RGTX | IWMY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.33% | -18.72% | -78.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -97.33% | -11.57% | -85.76% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -93.10% | -1.36% | -91.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -55.03% | -2.98% | -52.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 70.91% | 3.51% | +67.40% |
Volatility
RGTX vs. IWMY - Volatility Comparison
Defiance Daily Target 2X Long RGTI ETF (RGTX) has a higher volatility of 83.08% compared to Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF (IWMY) at 5.42%. This indicates that RGTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWMY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RGTX | IWMY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 83.08% | 5.42% | +77.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 139.30% | 12.62% | +126.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 215.89% | 15.69% | +200.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 223.72% | 15.75% | +207.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 223.72% | 15.75% | +207.97% |
RGTX vs. IWMY - Expense Ratio Comparison
RGTX has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than IWMY's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
RGTX vs. IWMY - Dividend Comparison
RGTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, less than IWMY's 45.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IWMY Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF | 45.96% | 63.33% | 107.92% | 11.34% |
RGTX Defiance Daily Target 2X Long RGTI ETF | 0.82% | 0.55% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RGTX and IWMY have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RGTX has higher volatility (83.08%) compared to IWMY (5.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RGTX dropped -97.33% vs IWMY's -18.72%.
On 1-year performance, IWMY leads with 23.33% vs -6.41% for RGTX. On fees, IWMY is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, IWMY has been the lower-risk option at 5.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, IWMY has performed better with a 23.33% return vs -6.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IWMY is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for RGTX.
IWMY has the higher dividend yield at 45.96%, compared with 0.82% for RGTX.
RGTX is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while IWMY is Options Trading. Their fees differ too: 1.29% for RGTX and 0.99% for IWMY.
IWMY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs -0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RGTX and IWMY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer