RGTX vs. GLDY
RGTX (Defiance Daily Target 2X Long RGTI ETF) and GLDY (Defiance Gold Enhanced Options Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RGTX is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Defiance, while GLDY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Defiance. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, RGTX returned -6.41% vs 13.84% for GLDY. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RGTX charges 1.29%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for GLDY.
Performance
RGTX vs. GLDY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RGTX achieves a -33.35% return, which is significantly lower than GLDY's -2.30% return.
RGTX
- 1D
- -20.63%
- 1M
- 51.50%
- YTD
- -33.35%
- 6M
- -56.81%
- 1Y
- -6.41%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GLDY
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- -1.38%
- YTD
- -2.30%
- 6M
- -0.58%
- 1Y
- 13.84%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RGTX vs. GLDY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
RGTX Defiance Daily Target 2X Long RGTI ETF | -33.35% | 114.56% |
GLDY Defiance Gold Enhanced Options Income ETF | -2.30% | 15.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between RGTX and GLDY is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2025 | 0.09 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RGTX vs. GLDY — Risk / Return Rank
RGTX
GLDY
RGTX vs. GLDY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Long RGTI ETF (RGTX) and Defiance Gold Enhanced Options Income ETF (GLDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RGTX | GLDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.03 | 0.70 | -0.73 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.69 | 0.92 | +0.77 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.16 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.07 | 1.03 | -1.10 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.09 | 2.47 | -2.56 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RGTX | GLDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.03 | 0.70 | -0.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | 0.56 | -0.30 |
Drawdowns
RGTX vs. GLDY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RGTX drawdown since its inception was -97.33%, which is greater than GLDY's maximum drawdown of -13.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGTX and GLDY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RGTX | GLDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.33% | -13.43% | -83.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -97.33% | -13.43% | -83.90% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -93.10% | -13.12% | -79.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -55.03% | -3.91% | -51.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 70.91% | 5.61% | +65.30% |
Volatility
RGTX vs. GLDY - Volatility Comparison
Defiance Daily Target 2X Long RGTI ETF (RGTX) has a higher volatility of 83.08% compared to Defiance Gold Enhanced Options Income ETF (GLDY) at 4.56%. This indicates that RGTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLDY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RGTX | GLDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 83.08% | 4.56% | +78.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 139.30% | 18.27% | +121.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 215.89% | 19.87% | +196.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 223.72% | 19.58% | +204.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 223.72% | 19.58% | +204.14% |
RGTX vs. GLDY - Expense Ratio Comparison
RGTX has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than GLDY's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
RGTX vs. GLDY - Dividend Comparison
RGTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, less than GLDY's 46.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
GLDY Defiance Gold Enhanced Options Income ETF | 46.42% | 37.38% |
RGTX Defiance Daily Target 2X Long RGTI ETF | 0.82% | 0.55% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RGTX and GLDY have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RGTX has higher volatility (83.08%) compared to GLDY (4.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RGTX dropped -97.33% vs GLDY's -13.43%.
On 1-year performance, GLDY leads with 13.84% vs -6.41% for RGTX. On fees, GLDY is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, GLDY has been the lower-risk option at 4.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GLDY has performed better with a 13.84% return vs -6.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GLDY is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for RGTX.
GLDY has the higher dividend yield at 46.42%, compared with 0.82% for RGTX.
RGTX is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while GLDY is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 1.29% for RGTX and 0.99% for GLDY.
GLDY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.70 vs -0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RGTX and GLDY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer