RGTU vs. TEMT
RGTU (Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF) and TEMT (Tradr 2X Long TEM Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Tradr. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, RGTU returned -24.32% vs -60.64% for TEMT. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 1.30% expense ratio.
Performance
RGTU vs. TEMT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RGTU achieves a -61.02% return, which is significantly lower than TEMT's -35.84% return.
RGTU
- 1D
- -11.74%
- 1M
- -51.89%
- YTD
- -61.02%
- 6M
- -68.54%
- 1Y
- -24.32%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TEMT
- 1D
- 11.14%
- 1M
- 27.18%
- YTD
- -35.84%
- 6M
- -46.30%
- 1Y
- -60.64%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RGTU vs. TEMT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
RGTU Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF | -61.02% | 90.43% |
TEMT Tradr 2X Long TEM Daily ETF | -35.84% | -38.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between RGTU and TEMT is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2025 | 0.45 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RGTU vs. TEMT — Risk / Return Rank
RGTU
TEMT
RGTU vs. TEMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF (RGTU) and Tradr 2X Long TEM Daily ETF (TEMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RGTU | TEMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 0.99 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.25 | -0.70 | +0.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.33 | -1.01 | +0.68 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RGTU vs. TEMT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RGTU drawdown since its inception was -96.96%, which is greater than TEMT's maximum drawdown of -87.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGTU and TEMT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RGTU | TEMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.96% | -87.10% | -9.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -96.96% | -87.10% | -9.86% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -95.64% | -81.24% | -14.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -63.86% | -50.59% | -13.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 73.82% | 60.18% | +13.64% |
Volatility
RGTU vs. TEMT - Volatility Comparison
Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF (RGTU) has a higher volatility of 64.59% compared to Tradr 2X Long TEM Daily ETF (TEMT) at 51.87%. This indicates that RGTU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TEMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RGTU | TEMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 64.59% | 51.87% | +12.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 140.29% | 94.08% | +46.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 219.46% | 130.25% | +89.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 219.07% | 137.06% | +82.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 219.07% | 137.06% | +82.01% |
RGTU vs. TEMT - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both RGTU and TEMT have an expense ratio of 1.30%.
Dividends
RGTU vs. TEMT - Dividend Comparison
RGTU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 52.92%, more than TEMT's 52.37% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
RGTU Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF | 52.92% | 20.63% |
TEMT Tradr 2X Long TEM Daily ETF | 52.37% | 33.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RGTU and TEMT have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RGTU has higher volatility (64.59%) compared to TEMT (51.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RGTU dropped -96.96% vs TEMT's -87.10%.
On 1-year performance, RGTU leads with -24.32% vs -60.64% for TEMT. Both ETFs have the same 1.30% expense ratio. On volatility, TEMT has been the lower-risk option at 51.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, RGTU has performed better with a -24.32% return vs -60.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RGTU and TEMT have the same expense ratio: 1.30% per year.
RGTU has the higher dividend yield at 52.92%, compared with 52.37% for TEMT.
RGTU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.11 vs -0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RGTU and TEMT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer