RGTU vs. QQQP

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

RGTU (Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF) and QQQP (Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Quarterly ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Tradr. Both are actively managed. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 1.30% expense ratio.

Performance

RGTU vs. QQQP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF (RGTU) and Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Quarterly ETF (QQQP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RGTU achieves a -46.61% return, which is significantly lower than QQQP's 33.67% return.

RGTU

• 1D: 0.54%
• 1M: -42.63%
• YTD: -46.61%
• 6M: -64.45%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QQQP

• 1D: -0.56%
• 1M: 4.47%
• YTD: 33.67%
• 6M: 31.35%
• 1Y: 73.51%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RGTU vs. QQQP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
RGTU Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF	-46.61%	90.43%
QQQP Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Quarterly ETF	33.67%	27.41%

Correlation

The correlation between RGTU and QQQP is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2025	0.45

Return for Risk

RGTU vs. QQQP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RGTU

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

QQQP

QQQP Risk / Return Rank: 61
QQQP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
QQQP Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
QQQP Omega Ratio Rank: 57
QQQP Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
QQQP Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RGTU vs. QQQP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF (RGTU) and Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Quarterly ETF (QQQP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RGTU	QQQP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.16	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.65	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.34	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.92	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	10.48	—

Drawdowns

RGTU vs. QQQP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RGTU drawdown since its inception was -96.96%, which is greater than QQQP's maximum drawdown of -42.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGTU and QQQP.

Drawdown Indicators

	RGTU	QQQP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-96.96%	-42.50%	-54.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-25.35%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-94.03%	-1.94%	-92.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-63.49%	-7.26%	-56.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	7.04%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	RGTU	QQQP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	14.48%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	27.11%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	219.34%	34.24%	+185.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	219.34%	44.27%	+175.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	219.34%	44.27%	+175.07%

RGTU vs. QQQP - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both RGTU and QQQP have an expense ratio of 1.30%.

Dividends

RGTU vs. QQQP - Dividend Comparison

RGTU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 38.64%, while QQQP has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
QQQP Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Quarterly ETF	0.00%	0.00%
RGTU Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF	38.64%	20.63%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RGTU and QQQP in my portfolio?

RGTU and QQQP have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, RGTU or QQQP?

Both ETFs have the same 1.30% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, RGTU or QQQP?

RGTU and QQQP have the same expense ratio: 1.30% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RGTU or QQQP?

RGTU has the higher dividend yield at 38.64%, compared with 0.00% for QQQP.