PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQQP vs. MON100.NS
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

QQQP vs. MON100.NS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Quarterly ETF (QQQP) and Motilal Oswal NASDAQ 100 ETF (MON100.NS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

QQQP vs. MON100.NS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
QQQP
Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Quarterly ETF
-11.26%30.21%10.88%
MON100.NS
Motilal Oswal NASDAQ 100 ETF
2.62%8.64%30.49%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQP achieves a -11.26% return, which is significantly lower than MON100.NS's 2.62% return.


QQQP

1D
2.43%
1M
-8.61%
YTD
-11.26%
6M
-9.55%
1Y
39.25%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MON100.NS

1D
2.79%
1M
6.99%
YTD
2.62%
6M
7.51%
1Y
32.17%
3Y*
31.68%
5Y*
20.17%
10Y*
23.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QQQP vs. MON100.NS - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQP has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than MON100.NS's 0.58% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

QQQP vs. MON100.NS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQP
QQQP Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
QQQP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQP Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQP Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

MON100.NS
MON100.NS Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
MON100.NS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MON100.NS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
MON100.NS Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
MON100.NS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
MON100.NS Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQP vs. MON100.NS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Quarterly ETF (QQQP) and Motilal Oswal NASDAQ 100 ETF (MON100.NS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QQQPMON100.NSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.84

1.61

-0.77

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.49

2.36

-0.87

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.31

-0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.64

2.01

-0.38

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.63

4.37

+1.26

QQQP vs. MON100.NS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQP Sharpe Ratio is 0.84, which is lower than the MON100.NS Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQP and MON100.NS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QQQPMON100.NSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

1.61

-0.77

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.94

-0.54

Correlation

The correlation between QQQP and MON100.NS is 0.08, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

QQQP vs. MON100.NS - Dividend Comparison

Neither QQQP nor MON100.NS has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

QQQP vs. MON100.NS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQP drawdown since its inception was -42.50%, which is greater than MON100.NS's maximum drawdown of -36.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQP and MON100.NS.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


QQQPMON100.NSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.50%

-36.27%

-6.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.35%

-13.06%

-12.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.71%

-4.57%

-13.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.83%

-7.33%

-0.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.38%

6.41%

+0.97%

Volatility

QQQP vs. MON100.NS - Volatility Comparison

Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Quarterly ETF (QQQP) has a higher volatility of 14.23% compared to Motilal Oswal NASDAQ 100 ETF (MON100.NS) at 9.18%. This indicates that QQQP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MON100.NS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


QQQPMON100.NSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.23%

9.18%

+5.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.26%

16.26%

+10.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

47.01%

20.56%

+26.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.93%

20.24%

+24.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

44.93%

23.07%

+21.86%