PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RGTU vs. NTSD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RGTU vs. NTSD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF (RGTU) and WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund (NTSD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


RGTU

1D
-0.51%
1M
46.09%
YTD
-27.08%
6M
-62.95%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NTSD

1D
1.08%
1M
6.63%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RGTU vs. NTSD - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between RGTU and NTSD is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2026

0.60

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RGTU vs. NTSD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF (RGTU) and WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund (NTSD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

RGTU vs. NTSD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RGTUNTSDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.16

5.46

-5.30

Drawdowns

RGTU vs. NTSD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RGTU drawdown since its inception was -96.96%, which is greater than NTSD's maximum drawdown of -5.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGTU and NTSD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RGTUNTSDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.96%

-5.20%

-91.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-91.85%

-0.04%

-91.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-62.33%

-0.83%

-61.50%

Volatility

RGTU vs. NTSD - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RGTUNTSDDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

219.22%

24.10%

+195.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

219.22%

24.10%

+195.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

219.22%

24.10%

+195.12%

RGTU vs. NTSD - Expense Ratio Comparison

RGTU has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than NTSD's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

RGTU vs. NTSD - Dividend Comparison

RGTU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 28.29%, while NTSD has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


RGTU and NTSD have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, NTSD is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

NTSD is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for RGTU.

RGTU has the higher dividend yield at 28.29%, compared with 0.00% for NTSD.

They also come from different issuers: Tradr and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for RGTU and 0.35% for NTSD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RGTU and NTSD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer