RGTU vs. NBIG

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

RGTU (Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF) and NBIG (Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RGTU charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for NBIG.

Performance

RGTU vs. NBIG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF (RGTU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF (NBIG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RGTU achieves a -78.15% return, which is significantly lower than NBIG's 129.20% return.

RGTU

• 1D: 0.84%
• 1M: -54.14%
• 6M: -83.28%
• YTD: -78.15%
• 1Y: -80.18%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NBIG

• 1D: 7.58%
• 1M: -64.93%
• 6M: 40.44%
• YTD: 129.20%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RGTU vs. NBIG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
RGTU Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF	-78.15%	-74.75%
NBIG Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF	129.20%	-59.80%

Correlation

The correlation between RGTU and NBIG is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2025	0.58

Return for Risk

RGTU vs. NBIG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RGTU

RGTU Risk / Return Rank: 7
RGTU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
RGTU Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
RGTU Omega Ratio Rank: 12
RGTU Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
RGTU Martin Ratio Rank: 5

NBIG

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RGTU vs. NBIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF (RGTU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF (NBIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RGTU	NBIG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.38	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.36	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.04	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.82	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.04	—	—

Drawdowns

RGTU vs. NBIG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RGTU drawdown since its inception was -97.58%, which is greater than NBIG's maximum drawdown of -75.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGTU and NBIG.

Drawdown Indicators

	RGTU	NBIG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-97.58%	-75.83%	-21.75%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-97.58%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-97.56%	-66.20%	-31.36%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-65.68%	-40.93%	-24.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	77.44%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	RGTU	NBIG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	41.28%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	140.80%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	210.20%	204.34%	+5.86%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	215.65%	204.34%	+11.31%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	215.65%	204.34%	+11.31%

RGTU vs. NBIG - Expense Ratio Comparison

RGTU has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than NBIG's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

RGTU vs. NBIG - Dividend Comparison

RGTU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 94.40%, while NBIG has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
NBIG Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%
RGTU Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF	94.40%	20.63%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RGTU and NBIG in my portfolio?

RGTU and NBIG have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, RGTU or NBIG?

On fees, NBIG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, RGTU or NBIG?

NBIG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for RGTU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RGTU or NBIG?

RGTU has the higher dividend yield at 94.40%, compared with 0.00% for NBIG.

What is the main difference between RGTU and NBIG?

They also come from different issuers: Tradr and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for RGTU and 0.75% for NBIG.