RGTU vs. IBIF

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

RGTU (Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF) and IBIF (iShares iBonds Oct 2029 Term TIPS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RGTU is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Tradr, while IBIF is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2029 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. RGTU is actively managed, while IBIF is passively managed. Over the past year, RGTU returned 0.54% vs 3.50% for IBIF. At a correlation of -0.04, they often move in opposite directions. RGTU charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for IBIF.

Performance

RGTU vs. IBIF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF (RGTU) and iShares iBonds Oct 2029 Term TIPS ETF (IBIF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RGTU achieves a -47.21% return, which is significantly lower than IBIF's 1.08% return.

RGTU

• 1D: -1.12%
• 1M: -43.27%
• YTD: -47.21%
• 6M: -59.39%
• 1Y: 0.54%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IBIF

• 1D: -0.05%
• 1M: -0.35%
• YTD: 1.08%
• 6M: 1.21%
• 1Y: 3.50%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RGTU vs. IBIF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
RGTU Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF	-47.21%	90.43%
IBIF iShares iBonds Oct 2029 Term TIPS ETF	1.08%	2.40%

Correlation

The correlation between RGTU and IBIF is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2025	-0.04

Return for Risk

RGTU vs. IBIF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RGTU

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

IBIF

IBIF Risk / Return Rank: 65
IBIF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
IBIF Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
IBIF Omega Ratio Rank: 59
IBIF Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
IBIF Martin Ratio Rank: 67

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RGTU vs. IBIF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF (RGTU) and iShares iBonds Oct 2029 Term TIPS ETF (IBIF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RGTU	IBIF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.70	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.69	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.33	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	3.70	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	11.32	—

Drawdowns

RGTU vs. IBIF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RGTU drawdown since its inception was -96.96%, which is greater than IBIF's maximum drawdown of -2.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGTU and IBIF.

Drawdown Indicators

	RGTU	IBIF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-96.96%	-2.50%	-94.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-96.96%	-0.95%	-96.01%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-94.10%	-0.93%	-93.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-63.61%	-0.55%	-63.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.31%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	RGTU	IBIF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.75%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	1.46%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	218.91%	2.07%	+216.84%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	218.91%	3.54%	+215.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	218.91%	3.54%	+215.37%

RGTU vs. IBIF - Expense Ratio Comparison

RGTU has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIF's 0.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

RGTU vs. IBIF - Dividend Comparison

RGTU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 39.08%, more than IBIF's 3.77% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
IBIF iShares iBonds Oct 2029 Term TIPS ETF	3.77%	4.51%	4.05%	0.96%
RGTU Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF	39.08%	20.63%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RGTU and IBIF in my portfolio?

RGTU and IBIF have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, RGTU or IBIF?

On 1-year performance, IBIF leads with 3.50% vs 0.54% for RGTU. On fees, IBIF is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RGTU or IBIF?

Over the 1-year period, IBIF has performed better with a 3.50% return vs 0.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RGTU or IBIF?

IBIF is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for RGTU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RGTU or IBIF?

RGTU has the higher dividend yield at 39.08%, compared with 3.77% for IBIF.

What is the main difference between RGTU and IBIF?

RGTU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while IBIF is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Tradr and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for RGTU and 0.10% for IBIF.