RGTU vs. FUMB
RGTU (Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF) and FUMB (First Trust Ultra Short Duration Municipal ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RGTU is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Tradr, while FUMB is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by First Trust. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. RGTU charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for FUMB.
Performance
RGTU vs. FUMB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RGTU achieves a -46.61% return, which is significantly lower than FUMB's 1.40% return.
RGTU
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- -42.63%
- YTD
- -46.61%
- 6M
- -64.45%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FUMB
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 0.40%
- YTD
- 1.40%
- 6M
- 1.40%
- 1Y
- 2.75%
- 3Y*
- 3.01%
- 5Y*
- 2.03%
- 10Y*
- —
RGTU vs. FUMB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
RGTU Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF | -46.61% | 90.43% |
FUMB First Trust Ultra Short Duration Municipal ETF | 1.40% | 1.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between RGTU and FUMB is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2025 | -0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RGTU vs. FUMB — Risk / Return Rank
RGTU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FUMB
RGTU vs. FUMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF (RGTU) and First Trust Ultra Short Duration Municipal ETF (FUMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RGTU | FUMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.83 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 12.64 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 47.61 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RGTU vs. FUMB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RGTU drawdown since its inception was -96.96%, which is greater than FUMB's maximum drawdown of -2.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGTU and FUMB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RGTU | FUMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.96% | -2.68% | -94.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.22% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -0.60% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -1.25% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -94.03% | 0.00% | -94.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -63.49% | -0.19% | -63.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.06% | — |
Volatility
RGTU vs. FUMB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RGTU | FUMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.21% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.55% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 219.34% | 0.77% | +218.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 219.34% | 1.17% | +218.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 219.34% | 1.76% | +217.58% |
RGTU vs. FUMB - Expense Ratio Comparison
RGTU has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than FUMB's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
RGTU vs. FUMB - Dividend Comparison
RGTU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 38.64%, more than FUMB's 2.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FUMB First Trust Ultra Short Duration Municipal ETF | 2.79% | 2.90% | 2.86% | 2.24% | 1.02% | 0.43% | 0.94% | 1.74% | 0.15% |
RGTU Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF | 38.64% | 20.63% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RGTU and FUMB have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FUMB is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FUMB is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for RGTU.
RGTU has the higher dividend yield at 38.64%, compared with 2.79% for FUMB.
RGTU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while FUMB is Municipal Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Tradr and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for RGTU and 0.45% for FUMB.
Find the right allocation for RGTU and FUMB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer