RGTU vs. CWVX

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

RGTU (Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF) and CWVX (Tradr 2X Long CRWV Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Tradr. Both are actively managed. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 1.30% expense ratio.

Performance

RGTU vs. CWVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF (RGTU) and Tradr 2X Long CRWV Daily ETF (CWVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RGTU achieves a -61.02% return, which is significantly lower than CWVX's 19.02% return.

RGTU

• 1D: -11.74%
• 1M: -51.89%
• YTD: -61.02%
• 6M: -68.54%
• 1Y: -24.32%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CWVX

• 1D: -4.13%
• 1M: -18.35%
• YTD: 19.02%
• 6M: -2.33%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RGTU vs. CWVX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
RGTU Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF	-61.02%	45.82%
CWVX Tradr 2X Long CRWV Daily ETF	19.02%	-81.40%

Correlation

The correlation between RGTU and CWVX is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2025	0.44

Return for Risk

RGTU vs. CWVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RGTU

RGTU Risk / Return Rank: 16
RGTU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
RGTU Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
RGTU Omega Ratio Rank: 25
RGTU Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
RGTU Martin Ratio Rank: 8

CWVX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RGTU vs. CWVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF (RGTU) and Tradr 2X Long CRWV Daily ETF (CWVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RGTU	CWVX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.11	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.54	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.25	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.33	—	—

Drawdowns

RGTU vs. CWVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RGTU drawdown since its inception was -96.96%, which is greater than CWVX's maximum drawdown of -89.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGTU and CWVX.

Drawdown Indicators

	RGTU	CWVX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-96.96%	-89.29%	-7.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-96.96%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-95.64%	-82.04%	-13.60%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-63.86%	-65.14%	+1.28%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	73.82%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	RGTU	CWVX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	64.59%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	140.29%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	219.46%	188.50%	+30.96%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	219.07%	188.50%	+30.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	219.07%	188.50%	+30.57%

RGTU vs. CWVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both RGTU and CWVX have an expense ratio of 1.30%.

Dividends

RGTU vs. CWVX - Dividend Comparison

RGTU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 52.92%, more than CWVX's 1.76% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
CWVX Tradr 2X Long CRWV Daily ETF	1.76%	2.10%
RGTU Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF	52.92%	20.63%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RGTU and CWVX in my portfolio?

RGTU and CWVX have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, RGTU or CWVX?

Both ETFs have the same 1.30% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, RGTU or CWVX?

RGTU and CWVX have the same expense ratio: 1.30% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RGTU or CWVX?

RGTU has the higher dividend yield at 52.92%, compared with 1.76% for CWVX.