PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RGTU vs. CWVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RGTU vs. CWVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF (RGTU) and Tradr 2X Long CRWV Daily ETF (CWVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RGTU achieves a -27.08% return, which is significantly lower than CWVX's 48.51% return.


RGTU

1D
-0.51%
1M
46.09%
YTD
-27.08%
6M
-62.95%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CWVX

1D
-5.31%
1M
-33.63%
YTD
48.51%
6M
-4.76%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RGTU vs. CWVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
RGTU
Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF
-27.08%68.09%
CWVX
Tradr 2X Long CRWV Daily ETF
48.51%-78.36%

Correlation

The correlation between RGTU and CWVX is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2025

0.43

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RGTU vs. CWVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF (RGTU) and Tradr 2X Long CRWV Daily ETF (CWVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

RGTU vs. CWVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RGTUCWVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.16

-0.38

+0.53

Drawdowns

RGTU vs. CWVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RGTU drawdown since its inception was -96.96%, which is greater than CWVX's maximum drawdown of -89.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGTU and CWVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RGTUCWVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.96%

-89.29%

-7.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-91.85%

-77.59%

-14.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-62.33%

-64.46%

+2.13%

Volatility

RGTU vs. CWVX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RGTUCWVXDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

219.22%

190.33%

+28.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

219.22%

190.33%

+28.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

219.22%

190.33%

+28.89%

RGTU vs. CWVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both RGTU and CWVX have an expense ratio of 1.30%.


Dividends

RGTU vs. CWVX - Dividend Comparison

RGTU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 28.29%, more than CWVX's 1.41% yield.


PositionTTM2025
CWVX
Tradr 2X Long CRWV Daily ETF
1.41%2.10%
RGTU
Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF
28.29%20.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


RGTU and CWVX have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 1.30% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

RGTU and CWVX have the same expense ratio: 1.30% per year.

RGTU has the higher dividend yield at 28.29%, compared with 1.41% for CWVX.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RGTU and CWVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer