PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RGTU vs. BITI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RGTU vs. BITI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF (RGTU) and ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RGTU achieves a -73.63% return, which is significantly lower than BITI's 28.75% return.


RGTU

1D
-14.02%
1M
-49.51%
6M
-79.70%
YTD
-73.63%
1Y
-55.67%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BITI

1D
2.65%
1M
1.46%
6M
34.68%
YTD
28.75%
1Y
68.34%
3Y*
-30.65%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RGTU vs. BITI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
RGTU
Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF
-73.63%90.43%
BITI
ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF
28.75%14.35%

Correlation

The correlation between RGTU and BITI is -0.41, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2025

-0.40

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RGTU vs. BITI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RGTU
RGTU Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
RGTU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RGTU Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
RGTU Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
RGTU Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
RGTU Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

BITI
BITI Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
BITI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BITI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
BITI Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
BITI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
BITI Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RGTU vs. BITI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF (RGTU) and ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RGTUBITIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.26

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.58

2.72

-3.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.73

6.78

-7.51

RGTU vs. BITI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RGTU Sharpe Ratio is -0.26, which is lower than the BITI Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RGTU and BITI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RGTU vs. BITI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RGTU drawdown since its inception was -97.05%, which is greater than BITI's maximum drawdown of -92.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGTU and BITI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RGTUBITIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.05%

-92.16%

-4.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-97.05%

-25.28%

-71.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-84.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-97.05%

-85.94%

-11.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-65.20%

-68.34%

+3.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

76.46%

10.11%

+66.35%

Volatility

RGTU vs. BITI - Volatility Comparison

Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF (RGTU) has a higher volatility of 46.68% compared to ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI) at 11.38%. This indicates that RGTU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BITI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RGTUBITIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

46.68%

11.38%

+35.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

139.87%

34.25%

+105.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

218.11%

44.14%

+173.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

216.19%

52.28%

+163.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

216.19%

52.28%

+163.91%

RGTU vs. BITI - Expense Ratio Comparison

RGTU has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than BITI's 1.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

RGTU vs. BITI - Dividend Comparison

RGTU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 78.22%, more than BITI's 15.10% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
BITI
ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF
15.10%1.60%3.91%3.33%0.06%
RGTU
Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF
78.22%20.63%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RGTU and BITI have a correlation of -0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RGTU has higher volatility (46.68%) compared to BITI (11.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RGTU dropped -97.05% vs BITI's -92.16%.

On 1-year performance, BITI leads with 68.34% vs -55.67% for RGTU. On fees, BITI is cheaper at 1.03% per year. On volatility, BITI has been the lower-risk option at 11.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BITI has performed better with a 68.34% return vs -55.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BITI is cheaper with a 1.03% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for RGTU.

RGTU has the higher dividend yield at 78.22%, compared with 15.10% for BITI.

RGTU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while BITI is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: Tradr and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for RGTU and 1.03% for BITI.

BITI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.56 vs -0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RGTU and BITI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer