RGTU vs. AAOX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

RGTU (Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF) and AAOX (Tradr 2X Long AAOI Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Tradr. RGTU is actively managed, while AAOX is passively managed. Their 0.52 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. RGTU charges 1.30%/yr vs 1.49%/yr for AAOX.

Performance

RGTU vs. AAOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF (RGTU) and Tradr 2X Long AAOI Daily ETF (AAOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

RGTU

• 1D: 1.46%
• 1M: -36.13%
• 6M: -62.74%
• YTD: -76.61%
• 1Y: -68.03%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -52.05%

AAOX

• 1D: 9.47%
• 1M: -48.97%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
AAOX Tradr 2X Long AAOI Daily ETF	$74.06M	$85.47M	$246.24M
RGTU Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF	$1.69M	$1.58M	$6.01M

RGTU vs. AAOX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
RGTU Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF	-43.99%
AAOX Tradr 2X Long AAOI Daily ETF	-59.23%

Correlation

The correlation between RGTU and AAOX is 0.52, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 24, 2026	0.52

Return for Risk

RGTU vs. AAOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RGTU

RGTU Risk / Return Rank: 11
RGTU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
RGTU Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
RGTU Omega Ratio Rank: 19
RGTU Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
RGTU Martin Ratio Rank: 5

AAOX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RGTU vs. AAOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF (RGTU) and Tradr 2X Long AAOI Daily ETF (AAOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RGTU	AAOX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.33	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.73	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.08	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.71	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.88	—	—

Drawdowns

RGTU vs. AAOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RGTU drawdown since its inception was -97.93%, which is greater than AAOX's maximum drawdown of -92.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGTU and AAOX.

Drawdown Indicators

	RGTU	AAOX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-97.93%	-92.64%	-5.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-97.93%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-97.39%	-89.09%	-8.30%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-66.82%	-42.84%	-23.98%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	79.64%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	RGTU	AAOX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	54.17%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	143.29%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	213.12%	294.73%	-81.61%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	215.68%	294.73%	-79.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	215.68%	294.73%	-79.05%

RGTU vs. AAOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RGTU has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is lower than AAOX's 1.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

RGTU vs. AAOX - Dividend Comparison

RGTU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 88.22%, while AAOX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
AAOX Tradr 2X Long AAOI Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%
RGTU Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF	88.22%	20.63%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RGTU and AAOX in my portfolio?

RGTU and AAOX have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, RGTU or AAOX?

On fees, RGTU is cheaper at 1.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, RGTU or AAOX?

RGTU is cheaper with a 1.30% expense ratio, compared with 1.49% for AAOX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RGTU or AAOX?

RGTU has the higher dividend yield at 88.22%, compared with 0.00% for AAOX.

What is the main difference between RGTU and AAOX?

Their fees differ too: 1.30% for RGTU and 1.49% for AAOX.