RGTI vs. PPFB.DE

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

RGTI (Rigetti Computing Inc) is a stock, while PPFB.DE (iShares Physical Gold ETC) is Gold fund tracking the Gold. Over the past 3 years, RGTI returned 152.06%/yr vs 31.53%/yr for PPFB.DE. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

RGTI vs. PPFB.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rigetti Computing Inc (RGTI) and iShares Physical Gold ETC (PPFB.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

RGTI is traded in USD, while PPFB.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the PPFB.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RGTI achieves a -5.28% return, which is significantly lower than PPFB.DE's 1.54% return.

RGTI

• 1D: 1.70%
• 1M: 8.87%
• YTD: -5.28%
• 6M: -18.81%
• 1Y: 84.04%
• 3Y*: 152.06%
• 5Y*: 16.53%
• 10Y*: —

PPFB.DE

• 1D: 0.72%
• 1M: -4.62%
• YTD: 1.54%
• 6M: 4.30%
• 1Y: 30.61%
• 3Y*: 31.53%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RGTI vs. PPFB.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
RGTI Rigetti Computing Inc	-5.28%	45.15%	1,449.40%	35.07%	-92.91%	5.00%
PPFB.DE iShares Physical Gold ETC	1.54%	68.33%	26.50%	12.88%	1.14%	-1.31%

Correlation

The correlation between RGTI and PPFB.DE is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.11
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.08
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2021	0.08

Return for Risk

RGTI vs. PPFB.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RGTI

RGTI Risk / Return Rank: 65
RGTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
RGTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
RGTI Omega Ratio Rank: 67
RGTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
RGTI Martin Ratio Rank: 58

PPFB.DE

PPFB.DE Risk / Return Rank: 36
PPFB.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
PPFB.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
PPFB.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 40
PPFB.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
PPFB.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 32

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RGTI vs. PPFB.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rigetti Computing Inc (RGTI) and iShares Physical Gold ETC (PPFB.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RGTI	PPFB.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.68	1.33	-0.65
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.78	1.77	+0.01
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.25	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.96	1.87	-0.92
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.47	4.78	-3.31

RGTI vs. PPFB.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RGTI Sharpe Ratio is 0.68, which is lower than the PPFB.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RGTI and PPFB.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RGTI vs. PPFB.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RGTI drawdown since its inception was -96.89%, which is greater than PPFB.DE's maximum drawdown of -21.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGTI and PPFB.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	RGTI	PPFB.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-96.89%	-21.42%	-75.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-77.10%	-17.21%	-59.89%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-78.83%	-17.21%	-61.62%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-96.89%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-62.76%	-15.63%	-47.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-58.84%	-5.42%	-53.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	49.98%	6.76%	+43.22%

Volatility

RGTI vs. PPFB.DE - Volatility Comparison

Rigetti Computing Inc (RGTI) has a higher volatility of 44.79% compared to iShares Physical Gold ETC (PPFB.DE) at 5.67%. This indicates that RGTI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PPFB.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RGTI	PPFB.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	44.79%	5.67%	+39.12%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	71.15%	21.08%	+50.07%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	109.21%	24.30%	+84.91%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	128.97%	17.39%	+111.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	127.17%	17.39%	+109.78%

Dividends

RGTI vs. PPFB.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither RGTI nor PPFB.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RGTI and PPFB.DE in my portfolio?

RGTI and PPFB.DE have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.