PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RGTI vs. BNB-USD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

RGTI vs. BNB-USD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rigetti Computing Inc (RGTI) and BNB (BNB-USD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RGTI achieves a -5.28% return, which is significantly higher than BNB-USD's -29.49% return.


RGTI

1D
1.70%
1M
8.87%
YTD
-5.28%
6M
-18.81%
1Y
84.04%
3Y*
152.06%
5Y*
16.53%
10Y*

BNB-USD

1D
0.91%
1M
-10.19%
YTD
-29.49%
6M
-32.13%
1Y
-7.11%
3Y*
36.86%
5Y*
10.55%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RGTI vs. BNB-USD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
RGTI
Rigetti Computing Inc
-5.28%45.15%1,449.40%35.07%-92.91%3.94%
BNB-USD
BNB
-29.49%23.21%124.36%26.83%-51.86%-5.83%

Correlation

The correlation between RGTI and BNB-USD is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 22, 2021

0.18

The correlation between RGTI and BNB-USD shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (all time) to 0.30 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RGTI vs. BNB-USD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RGTI
RGTI Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
RGTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RGTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
RGTI Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
RGTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
RGTI Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

BNB-USD
BNB-USD Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
BNB-USD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNB-USD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNB-USD Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
BNB-USD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNB-USD Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RGTI vs. BNB-USD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rigetti Computing Inc (RGTI) and BNB (BNB-USD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RGTIBNB-USDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.02

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.96

-0.13

+1.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.47

-0.20

+1.68

RGTI vs. BNB-USD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RGTI Sharpe Ratio is 0.68, which is higher than the BNB-USD Sharpe Ratio of -0.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RGTI and BNB-USD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RGTI vs. BNB-USD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RGTI drawdown since its inception was -96.89%, which is greater than BNB-USD's maximum drawdown of -79.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGTI and BNB-USD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RGTIBNB-USDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.89%

-79.74%

-17.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-77.10%

-56.24%

-20.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-78.83%

-56.24%

-22.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-96.89%

-69.89%

-27.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-62.76%

-53.42%

-9.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-58.84%

-38.71%

-20.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

49.98%

42.27%

+7.71%

Volatility

RGTI vs. BNB-USD - Volatility Comparison

Rigetti Computing Inc (RGTI) has a higher volatility of 44.79% compared to BNB (BNB-USD) at 17.28%. This indicates that RGTI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BNB-USD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RGTIBNB-USDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

44.79%

17.28%

+27.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

71.15%

34.73%

+36.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

109.21%

44.38%

+64.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

128.97%

50.42%

+78.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

127.17%

80.06%

+47.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


RGTI and BNB-USD have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RGTI has higher volatility (44.79%) compared to BNB-USD (17.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RGTI dropped -96.89% vs BNB-USD's -79.74%.

RGTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.68 vs -0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RGTI and BNB-USD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer