RGSVX vs. PAXDX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

RGSVX (ClearBridge Global Infrastructure Income Fund) and PAXDX (Pax Global Sustainable Infrastructure Fund) are both Energy Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, RGSVX returned 8.95%/yr vs 3.71%/yr for PAXDX. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RGSVX charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.83%/yr for PAXDX.

Performance

RGSVX vs. PAXDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ClearBridge Global Infrastructure Income Fund (RGSVX) and Pax Global Sustainable Infrastructure Fund (PAXDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RGSVX achieves a 12.29% return, which is significantly higher than PAXDX's 5.11% return.

RGSVX

• 1D: 1.20%
• 1M: -1.17%
• YTD: 12.29%
• 6M: 11.59%
• 1Y: 20.73%
• 3Y*: 13.80%
• 5Y*: 8.95%
• 10Y*: —

PAXDX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 5.11%
• 6M: 5.37%
• 1Y: 7.32%
• 3Y*: 8.76%
• 5Y*: 3.71%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RGSVX vs. PAXDX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RGSVX ClearBridge Global Infrastructure Income Fund	12.29%	26.02%	2.19%	3.64%	-5.85%	12.09%	12.33%	26.21%	-7.94%	17.05%
PAXDX Pax Global Sustainable Infrastructure Fund	5.11%	18.37%	-1.55%	9.33%	-13.45%	14.24%	14.25%	25.88%	-4.25%	18.28%

Correlation

The correlation between RGSVX and PAXDX is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.60
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.73
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.79
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2017	0.73

The correlation between RGSVX and PAXDX shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (1 year) to 0.79 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

RGSVX vs. PAXDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RGSVX

RGSVX Risk / Return Rank: 46
RGSVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
RGSVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
RGSVX Omega Ratio Rank: 39
RGSVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
RGSVX Martin Ratio Rank: 50

PAXDX

PAXDX Risk / Return Rank: 15
PAXDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
PAXDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
PAXDX Omega Ratio Rank: 14
PAXDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
PAXDX Martin Ratio Rank: 18

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RGSVX vs. PAXDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ClearBridge Global Infrastructure Income Fund (RGSVX) and Pax Global Sustainable Infrastructure Fund (PAXDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RGSVX	PAXDX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.82	0.92	+0.90
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.55	1.29	+1.26
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.19	+0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.16	1.65	+1.51
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.32	4.91	+5.40
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RGSVX vs. PAXDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RGSVX Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is higher than the PAXDX Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RGSVX and PAXDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RGSVX	PAXDX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.82	0.92	+0.90
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.64	0.29	+0.35
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.63	0.52	+0.11

Drawdowns

RGSVX vs. PAXDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RGSVX drawdown since its inception was -35.19%, roughly equal to the maximum PAXDX drawdown of -33.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGSVX and PAXDX.

Drawdown Indicators

	RGSVX	PAXDX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.19%	-33.58%	-1.61%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.49%	-4.49%	-2.00%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.54%	-14.56%	-1.98%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.50%	-25.04%	+0.54%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.54%	-0.74%	-2.80%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.62%	-5.27%	-0.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.98%	1.47%	+0.51%

Volatility

RGSVX vs. PAXDX - Volatility Comparison

ClearBridge Global Infrastructure Income Fund (RGSVX) has a higher volatility of 3.73% compared to Pax Global Sustainable Infrastructure Fund (PAXDX) at 0.00%. This indicates that RGSVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PAXDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RGSVX	PAXDX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.73%	0.00%	+3.73%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.46%	4.62%	+4.84%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.29%	8.08%	+3.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.06%	13.19%	+0.87%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.64%	16.52%	-0.88%

RGSVX vs. PAXDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RGSVX has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than PAXDX's 0.83% expense ratio.

Dividends

RGSVX vs. PAXDX - Dividend Comparison

RGSVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.76%, more than PAXDX's 2.06% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
PAXDX Pax Global Sustainable Infrastructure Fund	2.06%	2.17%	2.07%	2.43%	2.48%	58.94%	2.88%	4.69%	3.55%	2.13%	0.12%
RGSVX ClearBridge Global Infrastructure Income Fund	2.76%	3.00%	4.04%	4.78%	4.90%	4.65%	3.79%	2.99%	2.79%	2.20%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RGSVX and PAXDX in my portfolio?

RGSVX and PAXDX have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RGSVX or PAXDX?

RGSVX has higher volatility (3.73%) compared to PAXDX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RGSVX dropped -35.19% vs PAXDX's -33.58%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RGSVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.