RGSVX vs. FGIYX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

RGSVX (ClearBridge Global Infrastructure Income Fund) and FGIYX (Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund) are both Energy Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, RGSVX returned 8.95%/yr vs 9.51%/yr for FGIYX. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RGSVX charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for FGIYX.

Performance

RGSVX vs. FGIYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ClearBridge Global Infrastructure Income Fund (RGSVX) and Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund (FGIYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RGSVX achieves a 12.29% return, which is significantly higher than FGIYX's 10.02% return.

RGSVX

• 1D: 1.20%
• 1M: -1.17%
• YTD: 12.29%
• 6M: 11.59%
• 1Y: 20.73%
• 3Y*: 13.80%
• 5Y*: 8.95%
• 10Y*: —

FGIYX

• 1D: 1.53%
• 1M: -2.62%
• YTD: 10.02%
• 6M: 9.73%
• 1Y: 15.05%
• 3Y*: 14.69%
• 5Y*: 9.51%
• 10Y*: 9.23%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RGSVX vs. FGIYX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RGSVX ClearBridge Global Infrastructure Income Fund	12.29%	26.02%	2.19%	3.64%	-5.85%	12.09%	12.33%	26.21%	-7.94%	17.05%
FGIYX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund	10.02%	18.08%	10.91%	8.90%	-6.10%	14.85%	-2.55%	36.57%	-7.70%	19.02%

Correlation

The correlation between RGSVX and FGIYX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.91
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2017	0.92

The correlation between RGSVX and FGIYX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

RGSVX vs. FGIYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RGSVX

RGSVX Risk / Return Rank: 46
RGSVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
RGSVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
RGSVX Omega Ratio Rank: 39
RGSVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
RGSVX Martin Ratio Rank: 50

FGIYX

FGIYX Risk / Return Rank: 31
FGIYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
FGIYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
FGIYX Omega Ratio Rank: 24
FGIYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
FGIYX Martin Ratio Rank: 38

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RGSVX vs. FGIYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ClearBridge Global Infrastructure Income Fund (RGSVX) and Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund (FGIYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RGSVX	FGIYX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.82	1.43	+0.39
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.55	2.04	+0.51
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.26	+0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.16	2.47	+0.68
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.32	8.36	+1.96
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RGSVX vs. FGIYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RGSVX Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is comparable to the FGIYX Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RGSVX and FGIYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RGSVX	FGIYX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.82	1.43	+0.39
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.64	0.72	-0.08
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.60	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.63	0.45	+0.18

Drawdowns

RGSVX vs. FGIYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RGSVX drawdown since its inception was -35.19%, smaller than the maximum FGIYX drawdown of -49.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGSVX and FGIYX.

Drawdown Indicators

	RGSVX	FGIYX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.19%	-49.18%	+13.99%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.49%	-5.99%	-0.50%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.54%	-12.49%	-4.05%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.50%	-20.92%	-3.58%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-38.06%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.54%	-3.89%	+0.35%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.62%	-7.03%	+1.41%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.98%	1.77%	+0.21%

Volatility

RGSVX vs. FGIYX - Volatility Comparison

ClearBridge Global Infrastructure Income Fund (RGSVX) and Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund (FGIYX) have volatilities of 3.73% and 3.86%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RGSVX	FGIYX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.73%	3.86%	-0.13%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.46%	8.58%	+0.88%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.29%	10.37%	+0.92%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.06%	13.22%	+0.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.64%	15.36%	+0.28%

RGSVX vs. FGIYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RGSVX has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is lower than FGIYX's 0.97% expense ratio.

Dividends

RGSVX vs. FGIYX - Dividend Comparison

RGSVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.76%, less than FGIYX's 15.11% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FGIYX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund	15.11%	10.28%	7.74%	2.51%	6.41%	7.48%	1.62%	12.32%	6.62%	6.10%	8.64%	3.31%
RGSVX ClearBridge Global Infrastructure Income Fund	2.76%	3.00%	4.04%	4.78%	4.90%	4.65%	3.79%	2.99%	2.79%	2.20%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RGSVX and FGIYX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, RGSVX and FGIYX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, RGSVX or FGIYX?

FGIYX has higher volatility (3.86%) compared to RGSVX (3.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RGSVX dropped -35.19% vs FGIYX's -49.18%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RGSVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.