RGIYX vs. TMLPX

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

RGIYX (Russell Investments Global Infrastructure Fund) and TMLPX (Transamerica Energy Infrastructure) are both Infrastructure Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, RGIYX returned 7.96%/yr vs 9.66%/yr for TMLPX. Their 0.67 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. RGIYX charges 0.85%/yr vs 1.26%/yr for TMLPX.

Performance

RGIYX vs. TMLPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Russell Investments Global Infrastructure Fund (RGIYX) and Transamerica Energy Infrastructure (TMLPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RGIYX achieves a 10.36% return, which is significantly lower than TMLPX's 25.97% return. Over the past 10 years, RGIYX has underperformed TMLPX with an annualized return of 7.96%, while TMLPX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.66% annualized return.

RGIYX

• 1D: -0.18%
• 1M: -0.55%
• 6M: 6.28%
• YTD: 10.36%
• 1Y: 15.08%
• 3Y*: 14.18%
• 5Y*: 9.67%
• 10Y*: 7.96%
• ALL TIME*: 8.18%

TMLPX

• 1D: 0.75%
• 1M: 3.16%
• 6M: 18.64%
• YTD: 25.97%
• 1Y: 27.38%
• 3Y*: 23.04%
• 5Y*: 16.60%
• 10Y*: 9.66%
• ALL TIME*: 5.30%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
RGIYX Russell Investments Global Infrastructure Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
TMLPX Transamerica Energy Infrastructure	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

RGIYX vs. TMLPX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RGIYX Russell Investments Global Infrastructure Fund	10.36%	20.07%	9.96%	6.94%	-2.95%	12.44%	-3.37%	27.98%	-9.87%	18.96%
TMLPX Transamerica Energy Infrastructure	25.97%	3.87%	38.51%	5.07%	9.12%	23.54%	-11.25%	15.66%	-15.29%	-0.19%

Correlation

The correlation between RGIYX and TMLPX is 0.49, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.49
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.62
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.70
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.66
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2014	0.67

The correlation between RGIYX and TMLPX shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (1 year) to 0.70 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

RGIYX vs. TMLPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RGIYX

RGIYX Risk / Return Rank: 58
RGIYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
RGIYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
RGIYX Omega Ratio Rank: 50
RGIYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
RGIYX Martin Ratio Rank: 54

TMLPX

TMLPX Risk / Return Rank: 78
TMLPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
TMLPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
TMLPX Omega Ratio Rank: 69
TMLPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
TMLPX Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RGIYX vs. TMLPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Russell Investments Global Infrastructure Fund (RGIYX) and Transamerica Energy Infrastructure (TMLPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RGIYX	TMLPX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.52	1.89	-0.37
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.17	2.65	-0.48
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.32	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.58	3.80	-1.22
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.83	9.61	-1.77

RGIYX vs. TMLPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RGIYX Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is comparable to the TMLPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RGIYX and TMLPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RGIYX vs. TMLPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RGIYX drawdown since its inception was -39.17%, smaller than the maximum TMLPX drawdown of -67.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGIYX and TMLPX.

Drawdown Indicators

	RGIYX	TMLPX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.17%	-67.18%	+28.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.00%	-7.12%	+1.12%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.80%	-16.60%	+5.80%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.19%	-16.60%	-3.59%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.17%	-55.61%	+16.44%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.09%	-2.71%	+0.62%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.65%	-22.33%	+17.68%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.97%	2.81%	-0.84%

Volatility

RGIYX vs. TMLPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Russell Investments Global Infrastructure Fund (RGIYX) is 2.71%, while Transamerica Energy Infrastructure (TMLPX) has a volatility of 5.34%. This indicates that RGIYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TMLPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RGIYX	TMLPX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.71%	5.34%	-2.63%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.52%	11.65%	-3.13%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.21%	14.35%	-4.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.52%	17.25%	-3.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.83%	21.79%	-5.96%

RGIYX vs. TMLPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RGIYX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than TMLPX's 1.26% expense ratio.

Dividends

RGIYX vs. TMLPX - Dividend Comparison

RGIYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.21%, more than TMLPX's 3.78% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RGIYX Russell Investments Global Infrastructure Fund	8.21%	9.39%	5.64%	2.76%	3.46%	17.26%	7.80%	15.89%	9.20%	11.32%	6.70%	5.67%
TMLPX Transamerica Energy Infrastructure	3.78%	4.33%	3.71%	7.34%	4.83%	4.33%	6.09%	5.65%	6.10%	5.51%	3.95%	5.58%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RGIYX and TMLPX in my portfolio?

RGIYX and TMLPX have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RGIYX or TMLPX?

TMLPX has higher volatility (5.34%) compared to RGIYX (2.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RGIYX dropped -39.17% vs TMLPX's -67.18%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TMLPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.