PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RGIYX vs. RTHAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RGIYX vs. RTHAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Russell Investments Global Infrastructure Fund (RGIYX) and Russell Investments Tax-Exempt High Yield Bond Fund (RTHAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RGIYX achieves a 8.53% return, which is significantly higher than RTHAX's 2.46% return. Over the past 10 years, RGIYX has outperformed RTHAX with an annualized return of 8.08%, while RTHAX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.91% annualized return.


RGIYX

1D
1.32%
1M
-2.10%
YTD
8.53%
6M
8.20%
1Y
14.23%
3Y*
14.13%
5Y*
9.04%
10Y*
8.08%

RTHAX

1D
0.35%
1M
0.97%
YTD
2.46%
6M
2.56%
1Y
6.99%
3Y*
4.42%
5Y*
0.62%
10Y*
2.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RGIYX vs. RTHAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RGIYX
Russell Investments Global Infrastructure Fund
8.53%20.07%9.96%6.94%-2.95%12.44%-3.37%27.98%-9.87%18.96%
RTHAX
Russell Investments Tax-Exempt High Yield Bond Fund
2.46%2.11%4.49%7.78%-13.62%5.54%3.84%10.18%3.20%8.19%

Correlation

The correlation between RGIYX and RTHAX is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.16

The correlation between RGIYX and RTHAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (all time) to 0.28 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RGIYX vs. RTHAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RGIYX
RGIYX Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
RGIYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RGIYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
RGIYX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
RGIYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
RGIYX Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

RTHAX
RTHAX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
RTHAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RTHAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
RTHAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
RTHAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
RTHAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RGIYX vs. RTHAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Russell Investments Global Infrastructure Fund (RGIYX) and Russell Investments Tax-Exempt High Yield Bond Fund (RTHAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RGIYXRTHAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.40

2.34

-0.95

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.00

3.49

-1.49

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.61

-0.36

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.33

2.46

-0.13

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.94

8.09

-0.15

RGIYX vs. RTHAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RGIYX Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is lower than the RTHAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RGIYX and RTHAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RGIYXRTHAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.40

2.34

-0.95

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

0.12

+0.55

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

0.59

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.67

-0.15

Drawdowns

RGIYX vs. RTHAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RGIYX drawdown since its inception was -39.17%, which is greater than RTHAX's maximum drawdown of -18.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGIYX and RTHAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RGIYXRTHAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.17%

-18.89%

-20.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.00%

-2.74%

-3.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.74%

-7.56%

-6.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.19%

-18.89%

-1.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.17%

-18.89%

-20.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.71%

0.00%

-3.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.68%

-3.73%

-0.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.76%

0.83%

+0.93%

Volatility

RGIYX vs. RTHAX - Volatility Comparison

Russell Investments Global Infrastructure Fund (RGIYX) has a higher volatility of 3.53% compared to Russell Investments Tax-Exempt High Yield Bond Fund (RTHAX) at 1.10%. This indicates that RGIYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RTHAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RGIYXRTHAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.53%

1.10%

+2.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.20%

2.06%

+6.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.03%

2.89%

+7.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.57%

5.12%

+8.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.93%

4.98%

+10.95%

RGIYX vs. RTHAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RGIYX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than RTHAX's 0.89% expense ratio.


Dividends

RGIYX vs. RTHAX - Dividend Comparison

RGIYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.80%, more than RTHAX's 4.22% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RGIYX
Russell Investments Global Infrastructure Fund
8.80%9.39%5.64%2.76%3.46%17.26%7.80%15.89%9.20%11.32%6.70%5.67%
RTHAX
Russell Investments Tax-Exempt High Yield Bond Fund
4.22%3.60%4.02%3.97%3.64%2.80%3.10%3.83%3.86%3.44%4.06%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RGIYX and RTHAX have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RGIYX has higher volatility (3.53%) compared to RTHAX (1.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RGIYX dropped -39.17% vs RTHAX's -18.89%.

RTHAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RGIYX and RTHAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer