PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RGIYX vs. RELVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RGIYX vs. RELVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Russell Investments Global Infrastructure Fund (RGIYX) and Russell Investments LifePoints Equity Growth Strategy Fund (RELVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RGIYX achieves a 8.53% return, which is significantly lower than RELVX's 10.83% return. Over the past 10 years, RGIYX has underperformed RELVX with an annualized return of 8.08%, while RELVX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.30% annualized return.


RGIYX

1D
1.32%
1M
-2.10%
YTD
8.53%
6M
8.20%
1Y
14.23%
3Y*
14.13%
5Y*
9.04%
10Y*
8.08%

RELVX

1D
0.23%
1M
4.35%
YTD
10.83%
6M
11.59%
1Y
25.34%
3Y*
17.47%
5Y*
9.06%
10Y*
9.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RGIYX vs. RELVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RGIYX
Russell Investments Global Infrastructure Fund
8.53%20.07%9.96%6.94%-2.95%12.44%-3.37%27.98%-9.87%18.96%
RELVX
Russell Investments LifePoints Equity Growth Strategy Fund
10.83%18.70%12.82%18.70%-17.25%20.58%4.04%18.42%-9.80%15.56%

Correlation

The correlation between RGIYX and RELVX is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2011

0.77

Over the past year, the correlation between RGIYX and RELVX has dropped to 0.52 - well below their long-term average of 0.77, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RGIYX vs. RELVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RGIYX
RGIYX Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
RGIYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RGIYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
RGIYX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
RGIYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
RGIYX Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

RELVX
RELVX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
RELVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RELVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
RELVX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
RELVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
RELVX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RGIYX vs. RELVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Russell Investments Global Infrastructure Fund (RGIYX) and Russell Investments LifePoints Equity Growth Strategy Fund (RELVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RGIYXRELVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.44

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.33

2.95

-0.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.94

13.13

-5.19

RGIYX vs. RELVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RGIYX Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is lower than the RELVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RGIYX and RELVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RGIYXRELVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.40

2.42

-1.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

0.62

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

0.61

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.21

+0.31

Drawdowns

RGIYX vs. RELVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RGIYX drawdown since its inception was -39.17%, smaller than the maximum RELVX drawdown of -66.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGIYX and RELVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RGIYXRELVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.17%

-66.26%

+27.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.00%

-8.77%

+2.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.74%

-15.29%

+1.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.19%

-25.53%

+5.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.17%

-34.08%

-5.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.71%

0.00%

-3.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.68%

-17.30%

+12.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.76%

1.97%

-0.21%

Volatility

RGIYX vs. RELVX - Volatility Comparison

Russell Investments Global Infrastructure Fund (RGIYX) has a higher volatility of 3.53% compared to Russell Investments LifePoints Equity Growth Strategy Fund (RELVX) at 3.09%. This indicates that RGIYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RELVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RGIYXRELVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.53%

3.09%

+0.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.20%

8.40%

-0.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.03%

10.71%

-0.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.57%

14.65%

-1.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.93%

15.19%

+0.74%

RGIYX vs. RELVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RGIYX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than RELVX's 0.72% expense ratio.


Dividends

RGIYX vs. RELVX - Dividend Comparison

RGIYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.80%, less than RELVX's 9.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RELVX
Russell Investments LifePoints Equity Growth Strategy Fund
9.68%10.67%0.80%1.15%5.74%8.12%1.67%3.09%5.24%2.47%1.82%1.15%
RGIYX
Russell Investments Global Infrastructure Fund
8.80%9.39%5.64%2.76%3.46%17.26%7.80%15.89%9.20%11.32%6.70%5.67%

Frequently Asked Questions


RGIYX and RELVX have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RGIYX has higher volatility (3.53%) compared to RELVX (3.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RGIYX dropped -39.17% vs RELVX's -66.26%.

RELVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RGIYX and RELVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer