RGIYX vs. CSUIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Russell Investments Global Infrastructure Fund (RGIYX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. (CSUIX).
RGIYX is managed by Russell. It was launched on Sep 29, 2010. CSUIX is managed by Cohen & Steers. It was launched on May 2, 2004.
Performance
RGIYX vs. CSUIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RGIYX vs. CSUIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RGIYX Russell Investments Global Infrastructure Fund | 8.17% | 20.07% | 9.96% | 6.94% | -2.95% | 12.44% | -3.37% | 27.98% | -9.87% | 18.96% |
CSUIX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. | 8.44% | 14.69% | 8.74% | 2.46% | -4.89% | 16.60% | -1.29% | 24.72% | -5.52% | 18.15% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with RGIYX having a 8.17% return and CSUIX slightly higher at 8.44%. Over the past 10 years, RGIYX has outperformed CSUIX with an annualized return of 8.38%, while CSUIX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.83% annualized return.
RGIYX
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- -4.03%
- YTD
- 8.17%
- 6M
- 9.18%
- 1Y
- 22.05%
- 3Y*
- 13.51%
- 5Y*
- 10.24%
- 10Y*
- 8.38%
CSUIX
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- -4.36%
- YTD
- 8.44%
- 6M
- 9.16%
- 1Y
- 18.40%
- 3Y*
- 11.18%
- 5Y*
- 8.17%
- 10Y*
- 7.83%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RGIYX vs. CSUIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RGIYX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than CSUIX's 0.86% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RGIYX vs. CSUIX — Risk / Return Rank
RGIYX
CSUIX
RGIYX vs. CSUIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Russell Investments Global Infrastructure Fund (RGIYX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. (CSUIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RGIYX | CSUIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.86 | 1.67 | +0.20 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.41 | 2.21 | +0.20 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.33 | +0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.68 | 2.42 | +0.26 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.86 | 10.58 | +2.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RGIYX | CSUIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.86 | 1.67 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 | 0.64 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 | 0.53 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | 0.58 | -0.05 |
Correlation
The correlation between RGIYX and CSUIX is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
RGIYX vs. CSUIX - Dividend Comparison
RGIYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.68%, more than CSUIX's 7.76% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RGIYX Russell Investments Global Infrastructure Fund | 8.68% | 9.39% | 5.64% | 2.76% | 3.46% | 17.26% | 7.80% | 15.89% | 9.20% | 11.32% | 6.70% | 5.67% |
CSUIX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. | 7.76% | 8.41% | 2.58% | 2.53% | 3.91% | 3.25% | 1.64% | 1.83% | 2.45% | 5.12% | 2.35% | 6.52% |
Drawdowns
RGIYX vs. CSUIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RGIYX drawdown since its inception was -39.17%, smaller than the maximum CSUIX drawdown of -52.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGIYX and CSUIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RGIYX | CSUIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.17% | -52.01% | +12.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.43% | -7.99% | -0.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.19% | -20.01% | -0.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.17% | -35.01% | -4.16% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.03% | -4.36% | +0.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.70% | -8.21% | +3.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.75% | 1.82% | -0.07% |
Volatility
RGIYX vs. CSUIX - Volatility Comparison
Russell Investments Global Infrastructure Fund (RGIYX) has a higher volatility of 3.96% compared to Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. (CSUIX) at 3.24%. This indicates that RGIYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSUIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RGIYX | CSUIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.96% | 3.24% | +0.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.94% | 6.90% | +0.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.04% | 11.49% | +0.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.45% | 12.86% | +0.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.90% | 14.88% | +1.02% |