RGIYX vs. BGLYX
Compare and contrast key facts about Russell Investments Global Infrastructure Fund (RGIYX) and Brookfield Global Listed Infrastructure Fund (BGLYX).
RGIYX is managed by Russell. It was launched on Sep 29, 2010. BGLYX is managed by Brookfield Investment Funds. It was launched on Nov 29, 2011.
Performance
RGIYX vs. BGLYX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RGIYX vs. BGLYX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RGIYX Russell Investments Global Infrastructure Fund | 9.08% | 20.07% | 9.96% | 6.94% | -2.95% | 12.44% | -3.37% | 27.98% | -9.87% | 18.96% |
BGLYX Brookfield Global Listed Infrastructure Fund | 9.75% | 13.04% | 9.01% | 3.32% | -5.47% | 16.13% | -3.25% | 25.44% | -8.06% | 10.79% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RGIYX achieves a 9.08% return, which is significantly lower than BGLYX's 9.75% return. Over the past 10 years, RGIYX has outperformed BGLYX with an annualized return of 8.47%, while BGLYX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.40% annualized return.
RGIYX
- 1D
- 0.84%
- 1M
- -2.88%
- YTD
- 9.08%
- 6M
- 10.10%
- 1Y
- 22.44%
- 3Y*
- 13.83%
- 5Y*
- 10.27%
- 10Y*
- 8.47%
BGLYX
- 1D
- 1.12%
- 1M
- -3.19%
- YTD
- 9.75%
- 6M
- 10.88%
- 1Y
- 18.35%
- 3Y*
- 11.31%
- 5Y*
- 8.32%
- 10Y*
- 7.40%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RGIYX vs. BGLYX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RGIYX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than BGLYX's 1.00% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RGIYX vs. BGLYX — Risk / Return Rank
RGIYX
BGLYX
RGIYX vs. BGLYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Russell Investments Global Infrastructure Fund (RGIYX) and Brookfield Global Listed Infrastructure Fund (BGLYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RGIYX | BGLYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.93 | 1.57 | +0.36 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.48 | 2.09 | +0.39 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.30 | +0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.77 | 2.60 | +0.17 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.22 | 10.43 | +2.78 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RGIYX | BGLYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.93 | 1.57 | +0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 | 0.62 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 | 0.47 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.49 | +0.04 |
Correlation
The correlation between RGIYX and BGLYX is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
RGIYX vs. BGLYX - Dividend Comparison
RGIYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.61%, less than BGLYX's 28.23% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RGIYX Russell Investments Global Infrastructure Fund | 8.61% | 9.39% | 5.64% | 2.76% | 3.46% | 17.26% | 7.80% | 15.89% | 9.20% | 11.32% | 6.70% | 5.67% |
BGLYX Brookfield Global Listed Infrastructure Fund | 28.23% | 30.30% | 1.89% | 1.88% | 7.34% | 4.53% | 3.71% | 3.94% | 4.31% | 4.03% | 4.09% | 4.03% |
Drawdowns
RGIYX vs. BGLYX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RGIYX drawdown since its inception was -39.17%, which is greater than BGLYX's maximum drawdown of -36.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGIYX and BGLYX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RGIYX | BGLYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.17% | -36.54% | -2.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.43% | -7.55% | -0.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.19% | -20.94% | +0.75% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.17% | -36.54% | -2.63% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.22% | -3.48% | +0.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.70% | -7.92% | +3.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.77% | 1.88% | -0.11% |
Volatility
RGIYX vs. BGLYX - Volatility Comparison
Russell Investments Global Infrastructure Fund (RGIYX) and Brookfield Global Listed Infrastructure Fund (BGLYX) have volatilities of 4.08% and 4.12%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RGIYX | BGLYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.08% | 4.12% | -0.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.98% | 7.42% | -0.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.04% | 12.11% | -0.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.45% | 13.47% | -0.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.90% | 15.62% | +0.28% |