PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RGIYX vs. BGLYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RGIYX vs. BGLYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Russell Investments Global Infrastructure Fund (RGIYX) and Brookfield Global Listed Infrastructure Fund (BGLYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with RGIYX having a 8.53% return and BGLYX slightly higher at 8.61%. Over the past 10 years, RGIYX has outperformed BGLYX with an annualized return of 8.08%, while BGLYX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.39% annualized return.


RGIYX

1D
1.32%
1M
-2.10%
YTD
8.53%
6M
8.20%
1Y
14.23%
3Y*
14.13%
5Y*
9.04%
10Y*
8.08%

BGLYX

1D
1.30%
1M
-3.33%
YTD
8.61%
6M
8.20%
1Y
14.02%
3Y*
11.28%
5Y*
6.97%
10Y*
6.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RGIYX vs. BGLYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RGIYX
Russell Investments Global Infrastructure Fund
8.53%20.07%9.96%6.94%-2.95%12.44%-3.37%27.98%-9.87%18.96%
BGLYX
Brookfield Global Listed Infrastructure Fund
8.61%13.04%9.01%3.32%-5.47%16.13%-3.25%25.44%-8.06%10.79%

Correlation

The correlation between RGIYX and BGLYX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 2, 2011

0.91

The correlation between RGIYX and BGLYX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RGIYX vs. BGLYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RGIYX
RGIYX Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
RGIYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RGIYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
RGIYX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
RGIYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
RGIYX Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

BGLYX
BGLYX Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
BGLYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BGLYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
BGLYX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
BGLYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
BGLYX Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RGIYX vs. BGLYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Russell Investments Global Infrastructure Fund (RGIYX) and Brookfield Global Listed Infrastructure Fund (BGLYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RGIYXBGLYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.23

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.33

2.19

+0.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.94

7.21

+0.72

RGIYX vs. BGLYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RGIYX Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is comparable to the BGLYX Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RGIYX and BGLYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RGIYXBGLYXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.40

1.31

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

0.51

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

0.41

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.48

+0.04

Drawdowns

RGIYX vs. BGLYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RGIYX drawdown since its inception was -39.17%, which is greater than BGLYX's maximum drawdown of -36.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGIYX and BGLYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RGIYXBGLYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.17%

-36.54%

-2.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.00%

-6.32%

+0.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.74%

-14.56%

+0.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.19%

-20.94%

+0.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.17%

-36.54%

-2.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.71%

-4.48%

+0.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.68%

-7.85%

+3.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.76%

1.92%

-0.16%

Volatility

RGIYX vs. BGLYX - Volatility Comparison

Russell Investments Global Infrastructure Fund (RGIYX) and Brookfield Global Listed Infrastructure Fund (BGLYX) have volatilities of 3.53% and 3.58%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RGIYXBGLYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.53%

3.58%

-0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.20%

8.55%

-0.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.03%

10.54%

-0.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.57%

13.60%

-0.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.93%

15.64%

+0.29%

RGIYX vs. BGLYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RGIYX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than BGLYX's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

RGIYX vs. BGLYX - Dividend Comparison

RGIYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.80%, less than BGLYX's 28.53% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BGLYX
Brookfield Global Listed Infrastructure Fund
28.53%30.30%1.89%1.88%7.34%4.53%3.71%3.94%4.31%4.03%4.09%4.03%
RGIYX
Russell Investments Global Infrastructure Fund
8.80%9.39%5.64%2.76%3.46%17.26%7.80%15.89%9.20%11.32%6.70%5.67%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, RGIYX and BGLYX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

BGLYX has higher volatility (3.58%) compared to RGIYX (3.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RGIYX dropped -39.17% vs BGLYX's -36.54%.

RGIYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.40 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RGIYX and BGLYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer