RGHYX vs. SCFIX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

RGHYX (RBC BlueBay High Yield Bond Fund) and SCFIX (Shenkman Capital Short Duration High Income Fund) are both High Yield Bonds funds. Over the past 10 years, RGHYX returned 6.09%/yr vs 4.39%/yr for SCFIX. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RGHYX charges 0.57%/yr vs 0.67%/yr for SCFIX.

Performance

RGHYX vs. SCFIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RBC BlueBay High Yield Bond Fund (RGHYX) and Shenkman Capital Short Duration High Income Fund (SCFIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with RGHYX having a 1.46% return and SCFIX slightly lower at 1.42%. Over the past 10 years, RGHYX has outperformed SCFIX with an annualized return of 6.09%, while SCFIX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.39% annualized return.

RGHYX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.53%
• YTD: 1.46%
• 6M: 2.04%
• 1Y: 7.30%
• 3Y*: 8.87%
• 5Y*: 4.61%
• 10Y*: 6.09%

SCFIX

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: 0.55%
• YTD: 1.42%
• 6M: 2.02%
• 1Y: 5.44%
• 3Y*: 6.65%
• 5Y*: 4.47%
• 10Y*: 4.39%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RGHYX vs. SCFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RGHYX RBC BlueBay High Yield Bond Fund	1.46%	9.02%	7.14%	12.88%	-8.48%	3.72%	9.65%	15.83%	-0.73%	6.72%
SCFIX Shenkman Capital Short Duration High Income Fund	1.42%	7.02%	6.11%	9.24%	-2.52%	5.08%	3.36%	7.61%	0.85%	3.54%

Correlation

The correlation between RGHYX and SCFIX is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.78
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.77
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.82
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.78
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2013	0.75

The correlation between RGHYX and SCFIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

RGHYX vs. SCFIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RGHYX

RGHYX Risk / Return Rank: 79
RGHYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
RGHYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
RGHYX Omega Ratio Rank: 91
RGHYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
RGHYX Martin Ratio Rank: 69

SCFIX

SCFIX Risk / Return Rank: 95
SCFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
SCFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
SCFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 96
SCFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
SCFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RGHYX vs. SCFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RBC BlueBay High Yield Bond Fund (RGHYX) and Shenkman Capital Short Duration High Income Fund (SCFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RGHYX	SCFIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.91	3.36	-0.45
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.54	5.51	-0.98
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.66	1.83	-0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.86	4.90	-2.04
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.27	26.53	-13.26
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RGHYX vs. SCFIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RGHYX Sharpe Ratio is 2.91, which is comparable to the SCFIX Sharpe Ratio of 3.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RGHYX and SCFIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RGHYX	SCFIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.91	3.36	-0.45
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.06	1.62	-0.56
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	1.31	1.34	-0.03
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.44	1.34	+0.10

Drawdowns

RGHYX vs. SCFIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RGHYX drawdown since its inception was -17.38%, which is greater than SCFIX's maximum drawdown of -13.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGHYX and SCFIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	RGHYX	SCFIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.38%	-13.08%	-4.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.65%	-1.11%	-1.54%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.01%	-1.72%	-2.29%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-12.79%	-6.30%	-6.49%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-17.38%	-13.08%	-4.30%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.07%	0.00%	-0.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.48%	-0.51%	-0.97%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.57%	0.21%	+0.36%

Volatility

RGHYX vs. SCFIX - Volatility Comparison

RBC BlueBay High Yield Bond Fund (RGHYX) has a higher volatility of 0.84% compared to Shenkman Capital Short Duration High Income Fund (SCFIX) at 0.50%. This indicates that RGHYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RGHYX	SCFIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.84%	0.50%	+0.34%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.11%	1.30%	+0.81%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.61%	1.63%	+0.98%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.38%	2.77%	+1.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.67%	3.28%	+1.39%

RGHYX vs. SCFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RGHYX has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is lower than SCFIX's 0.67% expense ratio.

Dividends

RGHYX vs. SCFIX - Dividend Comparison

RGHYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.38%, more than SCFIX's 5.32% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RGHYX RBC BlueBay High Yield Bond Fund	6.38%	6.68%	6.91%	6.22%	6.04%	5.29%	5.54%	4.88%	6.79%	3.88%	4.44%	4.38%
SCFIX Shenkman Capital Short Duration High Income Fund	5.32%	5.54%	5.85%	5.21%	3.86%	4.93%	3.24%	3.78%	3.87%	3.09%	3.07%	3.38%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RGHYX and SCFIX in my portfolio?

RGHYX and SCFIX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RGHYX or SCFIX?

RGHYX has higher volatility (0.84%) compared to SCFIX (0.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RGHYX dropped -17.38% vs SCFIX's -13.08%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SCFIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.36 vs 2.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.