PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RGHYX vs. RUSIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RGHYX vs. RUSIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RBC BlueBay High Yield Bond Fund (RGHYX) and RBC Ultra-Short Fixed Income Fund (RUSIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RGHYX achieves a 1.46% return, which is significantly higher than RUSIX's 1.33% return. Over the past 10 years, RGHYX has outperformed RUSIX with an annualized return of 6.09%, while RUSIX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.01% annualized return.


RGHYX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.53%
YTD
1.46%
6M
2.04%
1Y
7.30%
3Y*
8.87%
5Y*
4.61%
10Y*
6.09%

RUSIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.26%
YTD
1.33%
6M
1.80%
1Y
3.92%
3Y*
6.11%
5Y*
3.76%
10Y*
3.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RGHYX vs. RUSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RGHYX
RBC BlueBay High Yield Bond Fund
1.46%9.02%7.14%12.88%-8.48%3.72%9.65%15.83%-0.73%6.72%
RUSIX
RBC Ultra-Short Fixed Income Fund
1.33%4.53%6.78%8.13%-1.43%0.10%2.58%4.18%1.60%1.85%

Correlation

The correlation between RGHYX and RUSIX is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2014

0.19

The correlation between RGHYX and RUSIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (all time) to 0.30 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RGHYX vs. RUSIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RGHYX
RGHYX Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
RGHYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RGHYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
RGHYX Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
RGHYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
RGHYX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

RUSIX
RUSIX Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
RUSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RUSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
RUSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
RUSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
RUSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RGHYX vs. RUSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RBC BlueBay High Yield Bond Fund (RGHYX) and RBC Ultra-Short Fixed Income Fund (RUSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RGHYXRUSIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.96

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.66

2.61

-0.95

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.86

9.97

-7.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.27

33.82

-20.55

RGHYX vs. RUSIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RGHYX Sharpe Ratio is 2.91, which is comparable to the RUSIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RGHYX and RUSIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RGHYXRUSIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.91

2.73

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.06

2.47

-1.41

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.31

2.06

-0.75

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.44

1.91

-0.47

Drawdowns

RGHYX vs. RUSIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RGHYX drawdown since its inception was -17.38%, which is greater than RUSIX's maximum drawdown of -5.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGHYX and RUSIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RGHYXRUSIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.38%

-5.60%

-11.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.65%

-0.40%

-2.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.01%

-0.40%

-3.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.79%

-3.83%

-8.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.38%

-5.60%

-11.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.07%

-0.10%

+0.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.48%

-0.34%

-1.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.57%

0.12%

+0.45%

Volatility

RGHYX vs. RUSIX - Volatility Comparison

RBC BlueBay High Yield Bond Fund (RGHYX) has a higher volatility of 0.84% compared to RBC Ultra-Short Fixed Income Fund (RUSIX) at 0.40%. This indicates that RGHYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RUSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RGHYXRUSIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.84%

0.40%

+0.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.11%

1.03%

+1.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.61%

1.45%

+1.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.38%

1.53%

+2.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.67%

1.47%

+3.20%

RGHYX vs. RUSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RGHYX has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is higher than RUSIX's 0.48% expense ratio.


Dividends

RGHYX vs. RUSIX - Dividend Comparison

RGHYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.38%, more than RUSIX's 4.25% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RGHYX
RBC BlueBay High Yield Bond Fund
6.38%6.68%6.91%6.22%6.04%5.29%5.54%4.88%6.79%3.88%4.44%4.38%
RUSIX
RBC Ultra-Short Fixed Income Fund
4.25%4.33%4.61%4.64%2.37%0.91%1.82%2.76%2.41%1.83%1.57%1.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


RGHYX and RUSIX have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RGHYX has higher volatility (0.84%) compared to RUSIX (0.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RGHYX dropped -17.38% vs RUSIX's -5.60%.

RGHYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.91 vs 2.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RGHYX and RUSIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer