RGHYX vs. FHYSX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

RGHYX (RBC BlueBay High Yield Bond Fund) and FHYSX (Federated Hermes High-Yield Strategy Portfolio) are both High Yield Bonds funds. Over the past 10 years, RGHYX returned 6.08%/yr vs 5.30%/yr for FHYSX. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RGHYX charges 0.57%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for FHYSX.

Performance

RGHYX vs. FHYSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RBC BlueBay High Yield Bond Fund (RGHYX) and Federated Hermes High-Yield Strategy Portfolio (FHYSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RGHYX achieves a 1.36% return, which is significantly higher than FHYSX's 1.19% return. Over the past 10 years, RGHYX has outperformed FHYSX with an annualized return of 6.08%, while FHYSX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.30% annualized return.

RGHYX

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: 0.43%
• YTD: 1.36%
• 6M: 1.94%
• 1Y: 6.98%
• 3Y*: 8.83%
• 5Y*: 4.57%
• 10Y*: 6.08%

FHYSX

• 1D: -0.17%
• 1M: 0.36%
• YTD: 1.19%
• 6M: 1.89%
• 1Y: 6.84%
• 3Y*: 8.48%
• 5Y*: 3.44%
• 10Y*: 5.30%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RGHYX vs. FHYSX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RGHYX RBC BlueBay High Yield Bond Fund	1.36%	9.02%	7.14%	12.88%	-8.48%	3.72%	9.65%	15.83%	-0.73%	6.72%
FHYSX Federated Hermes High-Yield Strategy Portfolio	1.19%	9.14%	6.42%	12.77%	-13.16%	4.49%	6.08%	15.14%	-2.16%	8.34%

Correlation

The correlation between RGHYX and FHYSX is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.44
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.59
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.74
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.75
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2012	0.74

Over the past year, the correlation between RGHYX and FHYSX has dropped to 0.44 - well below their long-term average of 0.74, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

RGHYX vs. FHYSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RGHYX

RGHYX Risk / Return Rank: 76
RGHYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
RGHYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
RGHYX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
RGHYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
RGHYX Martin Ratio Rank: 66

FHYSX

FHYSX Risk / Return Rank: 68
FHYSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
FHYSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
FHYSX Omega Ratio Rank: 78
FHYSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
FHYSX Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RGHYX vs. FHYSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RBC BlueBay High Yield Bond Fund (RGHYX) and Federated Hermes High-Yield Strategy Portfolio (FHYSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RGHYX	FHYSX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.78	2.07	+0.71
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.34	3.64	+0.70
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.63	1.52	+0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.74	2.89	-0.15
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.69	15.03	-2.34
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RGHYX vs. FHYSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RGHYX Sharpe Ratio is 2.78, which is higher than the FHYSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RGHYX and FHYSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RGHYX	FHYSX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.78	2.07	+0.71
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.05	0.66	+0.39
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	1.31	0.92	+0.38
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.43	0.88	+0.55

Drawdowns

RGHYX vs. FHYSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RGHYX drawdown since its inception was -17.38%, smaller than the maximum FHYSX drawdown of -21.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGHYX and FHYSX.

Drawdown Indicators

	RGHYX	FHYSX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.38%	-21.45%	+4.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.65%	-2.44%	-0.21%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.01%	-3.64%	-0.37%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-12.79%	-16.93%	+4.14%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-17.38%	-21.45%	+4.07%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.17%	-0.17%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.48%	-2.58%	+1.10%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.57%	0.47%	+0.10%

Volatility

RGHYX vs. FHYSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for RBC BlueBay High Yield Bond Fund (RGHYX) is 0.84%, while Federated Hermes High-Yield Strategy Portfolio (FHYSX) has a volatility of 0.91%. This indicates that RGHYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FHYSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RGHYX	FHYSX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.84%	0.91%	-0.07%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.11%	2.61%	-0.50%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.61%	3.40%	-0.79%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.38%	5.24%	-0.86%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.67%	5.77%	-1.10%

RGHYX vs. FHYSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RGHYX has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is higher than FHYSX's 0.02% expense ratio.

Dividends

RGHYX vs. FHYSX - Dividend Comparison

RGHYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.39%, more than FHYSX's 6.30% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FHYSX Federated Hermes High-Yield Strategy Portfolio	6.30%	6.28%	5.84%	5.30%	5.27%	4.54%	5.74%	6.18%	6.61%	6.98%	6.45%	8.45%
RGHYX RBC BlueBay High Yield Bond Fund	6.39%	6.68%	6.91%	6.22%	6.04%	5.29%	5.54%	4.88%	6.79%	3.88%	4.44%	4.38%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RGHYX and FHYSX in my portfolio?

RGHYX and FHYSX have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RGHYX or FHYSX?

FHYSX has higher volatility (0.91%) compared to RGHYX (0.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RGHYX dropped -17.38% vs FHYSX's -21.45%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RGHYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.78 vs 2.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.