PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RGC vs. INTU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

RGC vs. INTU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Regencell Bioscience Holdings Limited (RGC) and Intuit Inc. (INTU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RGC achieves a -10.33% return, which is significantly higher than INTU's -58.02% return.


RGC

1D
-4.37%
1M
-30.03%
YTD
-10.33%
6M
13.43%
1Y
-96.84%
3Y*
-8.77%
5Y*
10Y*

INTU

1D
-0.07%
1M
-29.59%
YTD
-58.02%
6M
-58.55%
1Y
-63.00%
3Y*
-14.21%
5Y*
-9.53%
10Y*
10.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RGC vs. INTU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
RGC
Regencell Bioscience Holdings Limited
-10.33%325.10%-52.95%-62.35%-12.43%165.42%
INTU
Intuit Inc.
-58.02%6.09%1.16%61.76%-39.12%28.00%

Correlation

The correlation between RGC and INTU is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2021

0.07

The correlation between RGC and INTU shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (3 years) to 0.17 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

RGC:

$9.31B

INTU:

$76.38B

EPS

RGC:

-$0.02

INTU:

$16.37

PB Ratio

RGC:

7.64K

INTU:

3.70

Total Revenue (TTM)

RGC:

$0.00

INTU:

$20.93B

Gross Profit (TTM)

RGC:

-$40.84K

INTU:

$16.97B

EBITDA (TTM)

RGC:

-$8.81M

INTU:

$6.65B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RGC vs. INTU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RGC
RGC Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
RGC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RGC Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
RGC Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
RGC Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
RGC Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

INTU
INTU Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
INTU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INTU Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
INTU Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
INTU Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
INTU Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RGC vs. INTU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Regencell Bioscience Holdings Limited (RGC) and Intuit Inc. (INTU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RGCINTUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.99

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.95

0.68

+0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.99

-0.97

-0.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.01

-1.88

+0.87

RGC vs. INTU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RGC Sharpe Ratio is -0.45, which is higher than the INTU Sharpe Ratio of -1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RGC and INTU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RGC vs. INTU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RGC drawdown since its inception was -98.82%, which is greater than INTU's maximum drawdown of -75.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGC and INTU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RGCINTUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.82%

-75.29%

-23.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-98.26%

-65.49%

-32.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-98.82%

-65.49%

-33.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-65.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-65.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-97.85%

-65.49%

-32.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-64.69%

-24.14%

-40.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

96.08%

33.92%

+62.16%

Volatility

RGC vs. INTU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Regencell Bioscience Holdings Limited (RGC) is 19.08%, while Intuit Inc. (INTU) has a volatility of 28.49%. This indicates that RGC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than INTU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RGCINTUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.08%

28.49%

-9.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

109.32%

42.51%

+66.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

216.12%

44.40%

+171.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

283.47%

37.54%

+245.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

283.47%

33.98%

+249.49%

Dividends

RGC vs. INTU - Dividend Comparison

RGC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while INTU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.68%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
INTU
Intuit Inc.
1.68%0.65%0.60%0.52%0.72%0.38%0.57%0.74%0.83%0.89%1.08%1.09%
RGC
Regencell Bioscience Holdings Limited
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

RGC vs. INTU - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Regencell Bioscience Holdings Limited and Intuit Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


-2.00B0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B2021202220232024202520260
8.56B
(RGC) Total Revenue
(INTU) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


RGC and INTU have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

INTU has higher volatility (28.49%) compared to RGC (19.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RGC dropped -98.82% vs INTU's -75.29%.

RGC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.45 vs -1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RGC and INTU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer