PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RGAGX vs. GFFFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RGAGX vs. GFFFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class R-6 (RGAGX) and American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class F-2 (GFFFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with RGAGX having a 6.52% return and GFFFX slightly lower at 6.45%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with RGAGX having a 16.44% annualized return and GFFFX not far behind at 16.26%.


RGAGX

1D
-2.18%
1M
-0.23%
YTD
6.52%
6M
5.31%
1Y
18.42%
3Y*
23.41%
5Y*
11.17%
10Y*
16.44%

GFFFX

1D
-2.18%
1M
-0.25%
YTD
6.45%
6M
5.26%
1Y
18.30%
3Y*
23.28%
5Y*
11.05%
10Y*
16.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RGAGX vs. GFFFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RGAGX
American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class R-6
6.52%20.08%28.41%37.66%-30.53%19.67%38.30%29.22%-2.88%26.53%
GFFFX
American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class F-2
6.45%19.96%28.28%37.51%-30.61%19.55%38.16%28.43%-2.96%26.38%

Correlation

The correlation between RGAGX and GFFFX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

1.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2009

1.00

The correlation between RGAGX and GFFFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RGAGX vs. GFFFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RGAGX
RGAGX Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
RGAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RGAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
RGAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
RGAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
RGAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

GFFFX
GFFFX Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
GFFFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GFFFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
GFFFX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
GFFFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
GFFFX Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RGAGX vs. GFFFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class R-6 (RGAGX) and American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class F-2 (GFFFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RGAGXGFFFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.23

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.50

1.49

+0.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.73

5.68

+0.05

RGAGX vs. GFFFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RGAGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is comparable to the GFFFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RGAGX and GFFFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RGAGX vs. GFFFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RGAGX drawdown since its inception was -36.19%, roughly equal to the maximum GFFFX drawdown of -36.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGAGX and GFFFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RGAGXGFFFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.19%

-36.26%

+0.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.71%

-13.74%

+0.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.54%

-21.55%

+0.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.19%

-36.26%

+0.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.19%

-36.26%

+0.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.69%

-3.69%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.48%

-5.56%

+0.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.58%

3.59%

-0.01%

Volatility

RGAGX vs. GFFFX - Volatility Comparison

American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class R-6 (RGAGX) and American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class F-2 (GFFFX) have volatilities of 7.15% and 7.16%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RGAGXGFFFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.15%

7.16%

-0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.16%

13.17%

-0.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.43%

16.44%

-0.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.45%

20.46%

-0.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.75%

19.75%

0.00%

RGAGX vs. GFFFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RGAGX has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than GFFFX's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

RGAGX vs. GFFFX - Dividend Comparison

RGAGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.32%, which matches GFFFX's 10.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GFFFX
American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class F-2
10.28%10.95%9.23%7.64%4.32%8.42%4.51%7.38%12.29%7.27%6.87%9.13%
RGAGX
American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class R-6
10.32%10.99%9.29%7.70%4.44%8.49%4.57%7.93%12.36%7.34%6.95%9.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, RGAGX and GFFFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

GFFFX has higher volatility (7.16%) compared to RGAGX (7.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RGAGX dropped -36.19% vs GFFFX's -36.26%.

RGAGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.25 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RGAGX and GFFFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer